Within hours of the High Court finding that a Conservative consultation on changes to the work capability assessment (WCA) was unlawful, Labour has announced it will “re-consult on the descriptor changes”. 

Earlier today, we reported that the High Court had found that a consultation on changes to the WCA by the Tories in September 2023 “was so unfair as to be unlawful.”

The judge held that the DWP had: failed to adequately explain the proposals; had failed to explain that the main purpose was to save money rather than to get claimants into work; had failed to provide sufficient time for the consultation.

Following the now outlawed consultation, the Conservatives announced that they would save £3 billion by making three major changes to the WCA.

These were:

Mobilising:  the points would be unchanged, but the highest scoring descriptor would no longer give claimants limited capability for work-related activity (LCWRA).

Getting about: the highest scoring descriptor would still give limited capability for work (LCW), but the scores for the other descriptors would be reduced.

Substantial risk for LCWRA:  this would be unchanged for physical health.  But for mental health the criteria would be made much stricter. 

At the same time, the Conservatives said that a “Chance to Work Guarantee” would mean that they would “abolish the WCA for the vast majority” of current claimants with LCWRA, thereby “giving people the confidence to try work”.

When Labour came to power in July 2024, they confirmed that they would be reforming or abolishing the WCA, but have refused to give any further details.

However, they fought the judicial challenge to the Tories consultation as if it were their own consultation that was being challenged.

And now, within hours of the High Court decision, the Guardian has reported a government spokesperson as saying:

“The judge has found the previous government failed to adequately explain their proposals. As part of wider reforms that help people into work and ensure fiscal sustainability, the government will re-consult on the WCA descriptor changes, addressing the shortcomings in the previous consultation, in light of the judgment. The government intends to deliver the full level of savings in the public finances forecasts.”

The announcement seems to suggest that, rather than introducing their own changes to the WCA, Labour intends to re-consult on the Tory proposals.

If it was Labour’s intention all along to introduce the Tory WCA changes, which they would not have needed to consult on again were it not for today’s High Court ruling, then many voters will feel that the government acted in extreme bad faith by keeping their plan secret since before the election.

And given the spokesperson’s firm undertaking that Labour intends to deliver the Tory’s forecast savings, few people will  have any faith in the genuineness of this new consultation.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    How can they just have rerun of the Tory consultation with some tweaks if it was found top be unlawful?
    This bunch of red tory reactionaries are going to face future legal challenges. How stupid and wasteful of public money.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 22 days ago
    "And now, within hours of the High Court decision, the Guardian has reported a government spokesperson as saying:

    “The judge has found the previous government failed to adequately explain their proposals. As part of wider reforms that help people into work and ensure fiscal sustainability, the government will re-consult on the WCA descriptor changes, addressing the shortcomings in the previous consultation, in light of the judgment. The government intends to deliver the full level of savings in the public finances forecasts.”

    Gaslighting sh*t bags. 

    This is utter nonsense. The previous government may have put forward the proposals, but the current government were quite happy to pursue it until the end. Hence the need for high court intervention.

    This ramshackle of a government continue to blame the previous administration for THEIR mess.

    It won't work. We are into you Labour. You can't and won't treat us like mugs.

    Never again will Labour gain power. And that would be too soon.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 23 days ago
      I M so disappointed to what this country is becoming. To think what our kids have to look forward too nothing .  My grandad said it they had best years of this country. Doesn’t not matter what government get in . They are  all the same attacking all the wrong people all the time . I worked with my illiness and disability’s for years until I could nt work no more . I have 6 illnesses  and disability  can’t walk  and pain al the time  and government want to attack us . I’m not saying there ain’t people out there that get pip and other benefits that are scram the system but find who they are and live people alone that do need the help and stop put our life on the line and send people to an early death cause that is what will happen 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 24 days ago
    I have disabilities and my health is still deteriorating. I had transverse myelitis in 2020 which affected the left side of my body mostly and there is no cure for this, it’s very similar to MS only this affects the spine.
    Since then my foot has collapsed and I am in extensive pain when I try to stand or walk. I have so much trouble trying to clean my own house I have to sit down  when trying to cook as the pain literally kicks in soon as I stand. 

    What this government is doing will be major to some people who rely on the PIP money I use my for car finance and insurance due to having points and not being able to get a mobility car. 
    Vouchers what are they going to do to help me get to work, nothing when you have to be prepared to travel for 90 minutes.
    This prime minister needs to resign and all of his team. Labour is a working man’s party not like Tory’s, but this labour government may as well be Tory. Tony Blair is was the best prime minister this country ever had. All this trying to get back into Europe, yea that will help the country but it was the British people who chose this. 

    The only way to make this country better is to stop letting people from other countries in as we are one of the smallest countries in the whole world and this is causing  issues for housing British people. We don’t get the name in other countries so why don’t the government do the same for here 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 24 days ago
    80 yrs since the liberation of Nazi concentration camps, labour have learnt nothing,they all say never again learn from these mistakes & for what?..just to head down the same road Hitlers cronies went down in the 1930's,it all started like this & the treatment of disabled,the unhealthy who can't be made slaves of for a corrupt & heartless govt the only difference being is it's underhanded & goes unnoticed,hiding benefits deaths due to their severe treatment of people,I was nearly one of them starved for a 41 day sanction cos they didn't believe me about my spine until made to walk 8 miles there and back to get an x-ray as proof & the proof was clear,they still do not communicate with each other only for some desperate scrote of a so called work coach to send me a job notice to ask if I wanted to be a work coach(desperate)not a clue,run by morons & the most self serving lawless department in the UK's government.I will never vote again!!!!!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 29 days ago
    Seen elsewhere online. It's funny because it rings so true:


    Congratulations! Our new AI agent ShatGPT has been monitoring your internet activity and determined that you are fit for work in a remote working capacity. You start your new remote job at Compu-Global-Hyper-Mega-Net on Saturday. Please note that Compu-Global-Hyper-Mega-Net do not support remote working and you will be expected to arrive in person at their global office on the moon by 3am for your induction. By reading this you waive your rights to any form of reasonable adjustments at your new workplace, including accessible entrances, dietary considerations or breathing apparatus.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    No matter what Sunak did, his poll rating never recovered, and that was reflected in the election.

    Starmer is doing exactly the same. He seems to think people will change their mind and vote for Labour again in 4.5 years time, however I think he underestimates that people are now considering Labour as no different from the Tories, so all the anger previously aimed at the Tories has been directly transferred to Starmer.

    He has pushed labour so far to the right that it's no longer Labour. He has made the party unelectable, I don't see how Labour will recover from this. Everyone I know who voted labour has said they will never vote for them again. People are eyeing up Lib Dem and Green.

    This constant attack on the elderly and disabled is utterly abhorrent coming from Labour, we've all been lied to and treated like mugs. 


    2028 years can't come around soon enough. Tories and Labour are now on most people's ban list.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    It was interesting, by which I mean repulsive, to see Starmer telling the Sun that he "has the balls" to cut benefits. Perhaps he should also have been asked if he "has the balls" to ask the super rich to pay a bit more rather than going after disabled people and pensioners. But presumably "tough decisions" only ever applies to people who don't have wealth or power. Asking the wealthiest to pay a bit more? No, we can't have that. That's a bit TOO tough.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 23 days ago
      @tintack It will never change who ever gets in power they attack the same people
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    I haven't seen the list of severe disabilities, but I can hazard a guess of what it may include:

    terminal illness, eg cancer
    Severe mental illness, eg schziophrenia
    Motor neurone disease
    Multiple sclerosis in its more advanced stages
    profound dual sensory impairment, with a visual acuity of less than 3/60 in both eyes and hearing loss in both ears in excess of 60 db
    Paralysis from the neck down
    Profound learning disability
    And that may be it......

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 24 days ago
      @SLB I agree with you to some extent, but I’m in the lower PIP group and it’s a life line to me. It’s the difference between shopping in Aldi or having to go to a food bank - and that’s just an example.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 24 days ago
      @Matt In other words, unless. You’re in one of those, they can take away your disability benefits even though you still cannot work and hence get the savings they need to pull the country out of a so called “black hole’!!…..leaving millions of people in very severe conditions. Perhaps they’re then hoping there will be a huge rise in suicides too to really save them money!!!

      The government really are Barbaric!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Matt Epilepsy with daily seizures is one as well 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @SLB Good post that. Many good points and much food for that.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @SLB From a financial point of view it is indeed probably cheaper to leave people alone rather than roll out a huge reassessment program. But we saw with the Tories that the onslaught on sick and disabled people was ideological - it never saved any money. In fact, at one stage they gave Maximus a WCA contract under which Maximus was supposed to make £1billion of savings - and they were being paid £1.6billiion to do so. So even if the savings were made (never mind the human suffering involved in making those savings, which is a euphemism for denying support to as many seriously ill people as possible), the government would still lose out to the tune of £600million. Yet they went ahead anyway.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Labour follow Tory Policy. I knew that would happen with the rhetoric from Labour over the last couple of years. The reason I didn't vote Labour. They planning to cut the amount PIP pays, that is their next evil plan to attack the weakest in society. All this help disabled and long term sick back into work is a ploy to attack PIP as a none means tested benefit. I see Labour trying to link PIP to work and I can see them making it a means tested benefit to slash claims. Exactly like they have done with the winter fuel payments for pensioners.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    found something not long ago it was something about what the last government from 2024 wanted classed as severe disabilities  it wasn't from the news papers  it's to long to try type and explain on here as it's a lot of info think it was a clue to who wouldn't be  able to claim anything in the future  could be wrong don't  know how to post it on here but didn't see no mention of ADHD or mild autism ,mild depression or anxiety and didn't see fibromyalgia on the list it took ages to read  it all  .
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    I can't help but some here are basing their views on how they'd like things to be, rather than how they actually are. Labour (who gave us the original WCA) will re-run the consultation correctly, so the cuts cannot be delayed further. They will not u-turn on their commitment to cut £3bn from the welfare budget (see Starmer's interview in The Sun). Labour are not and have never been a friend to the disabled community!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 days ago
      @SLB Unless you are up for pip review which I am and Got a feeling Pip will be linked to work because you can work on Pip then take away your lcwra status probably all reforms going change pip into categories making it harder for people to claim I'm dreading my Pip review now 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 24 days ago
      @Rik Thank you !!! I'm not sure where people think Labour care about people , they don't and people saying they are Tory polices , indeed they are , but if Labour were on our side, they would have scrapped them, these are typical Labour polices , anyone who thought otherwise are seriously naive 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 24 days ago
      @SLB Yes, but there's a better chance of stopping things if we campaign as the process is starting (or restarting in this case). The migration to UC is appalling but it's unlikely to be stopped now, just slowed down a bit. And that's only because it's an unrealistic timeline, not because of the harm it's causing.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 24 days ago
      @Jen Age 61   was labour supporter /   & unite union member  40 + YRS .  STARMER / REEVES  LABOUR 2024   FAR  MORE CENTRAL RIGHT /// THAN BROWN /BLAIR 1997-2010 .    MORE BRUTAL IF TAKE £ 416 MOUTH , LCWRA AWAY . 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Jen But they didn't do it, did they?  And Labour have always said they'd try to cut the welfare budget - but they also said they wouldn't necessarily make the cuts in the same way as the Tories were planning.  So, we're here again, forever trying to predict what might happen, and not getting anywhere.  We might as well carry on, and wait to see what actually changes, if anything.  Universal Credit started in 2013, and it's taken eleven or twelve years before most of us were moved on to it.  These things don't happen quickly.  And even if changes were made, it's not likely to affect people already on benefits for the next few years anyway. 
       Of much more concern right now is the migration to UC, which is happening to people NOW, and that we know is happening, and that those people will have their benefits cut by several hundred pounds a month in real terms in the coming years.  Why not worry about the present instead of something we have no knowledge of in the future?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    there will be a big back lash with all this, high court etc including with any messing with idealistic ideas on PIP. A judge has clearly seen through their nonsense.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    what does this mean for us all?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @SLB thank you for your positive comment.  Reminding people that whatever happens, it will take several years to implement is a comfort.  I have five years left til retirement, so the more years that are taken from that, the better I will feel about any changes. Little things help with severe mental health issues.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @SLB Yes, it has taken a dozen years to get to this point re ESA to UC.  I wouldn't be in the slightest bit surprised to see the DWP challenged in the High Court again by disability charities re the speed of the rollout. Ellen Clifford has already given the DWP food for thought by defeating them in December. Another defeat in the High Court might well see the can kicked down the road again.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Arthur That's not true, Arthur.  They said they will make the same budget cuts as the Tories, but said quite clearly it probably wouldn't be in the same way.  To be honest, the best way they could cut costs is by ending reassessments for people who are never going to get better.  I also wouldn't be surprised if they had UC incorporate PIP at some point.  Surely, the less separate benefits there are, the less it costs in admin.   But, again, it's all supposition and theories at this point.  Whatever happens, it's going to take several years to implement, that's for sure.  It's taken a dozen years of UC before ESA claimaints have been transferred!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @axab43 Apologies, I failed to explain myself sufficiently, when I mentioned Labour implementing the Tory plans, I was referring to the WCA, not the PIP vouchers, Specifically changing the descriptors for LCWRA, and essentially making it alot harder to qualify for LCWRA, which would lead to hundreds of thousands of disabled people losing £416 a month. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Arthur They will not be implementing the PIP voucher scheme.   Have to be careful with the words we use as people, including yourself from the sounds of it, worry so much.  And they will have to be more careful as obviously the courts are onto them. That is actually positive.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    What does it mean they'll  re consult  If a judge has said it's unlawful on the last plans  they won't be able to match the cuts the last government wanted no way and they won't be able to hide anything when doing green paper it's confusing on what to think will happen next .
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 24 days ago
      @Lill The judge said the consultation was unlawful, not that the cuts themselves were unlawful.  The judge decided that the consultation (which many of us wrote in with answers to last year) wasn't honest and was too rushed.  Sadly the judge has not said disability cuts themselves are unlawful, only that the government have to be honest about their plans.  So the government will re do the consultation by the letter of the law, and bring in the same cuts anyway. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @MrFibro People will be put in no mans land. Not sick enough to get benefit. Not healthy to actually get a job, or work hours to actually pay for anything.

      So they will be dependent on food banks etc.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @ShadowPony I'd say the vast majority of this country (employers) cannot support the needs of disabled people in the British workforce.  Labours in total denial.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Lill basically the courts have got the measure of this government, same as the last when it comes to disabled people really, and it will be easier to take judicial review now, if they carry on with the rubbish consultations. the aim cannot just be to save money, it has to come with genuine support and safeguards. in the end, there are going to be some disabilities that the workplace isn't ready for, no matter what government may think. the government's assertion that work from home was a right in all but name has been blown out of the water with the recent mandation of back to the office by employers for instance.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Labour want to cut that 3 billion the Tories pledged to cut, it's baked into treasury numbers.

    So how are they going to do it? You have to come to the most rational conclusions, look for what is brought up in the press as the Downing Street tells the press in advance to test the waters.

    What has the Telegraph/Mail/Times being banging on about since 2023? Depression and Anxiety.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Rik Why is this clear? The Work and Capability Assessment has assessment criteria that is all about mental health, not physical disability, ie engaging with people.  That is about mental ill health  not physical.  There is no suggestion of removing those kind of questions completely.  (IN fact the second half ot the WCA is about mental ill health, mainly.    Kendall cannot decide what is and is not considered a disability as mental ill health, as stated above, can affect people's day to day activities  as much as physical disability can.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Dave Dee Yes. Kendal has made it clear that mental health shouldn't be considered a disability; and it's clear, going forward, mental health will not qualify for disability benefits. Labour are going to go much further by making it very difficult for anyone with a physical disability to also qualify for disability benefits. It's all about getting everyone on the lowest level of UC, rather than getting them off of benefits.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Dave Dee Depression and anxiety can affect day to day life sometimes more than other illnesses can.  The only way they can cut benefits from people with extreme depression will be that the people they assess do not know how to verbalise how depression affects them.  People with extreme/depression would not be able to go out to work, sometimes not able to go out, so there is no way they can be found fit for work, under any assessment process.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Unless I've missed it, I can't find any mention of this on the BBC news website. Can't say I'm surprised by the omission.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    It would certainly be interesting to take LCWRA away from me, I don't know what they suppose I should do. I have a rare form of dwarfism, I'm 3ft something in a wheelchair. My health complications dictate everything,  I have no consistency as to when or if it could work due to the swings of migraines, tiredness and pain levels thanks to degenerative joint issues. I was called into the job centre recently, they didn't know what to do or say. I guess work coaches don't see many people with dwarfism, let alone trained in disability awareness. I pointed out that every computer they had was out of reach if I had to use them. You could see how embarrassed they were forever apologising.  When you're the size of a 5-year-old child it's nearly impossible to function independently as the infrastructure just isn't there.  The government might want me to work, but employers are never going to take that chance.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Phil. I can't speak for Labour.
      None of us know their plans but I don't think you should worry.
      Your needs and abilities are so complex and demanding.
      We are all questioning who will be effected.
      I hate them for leaving people hanging.
      It's cruel.
      What I keep seeing is the phrase " Self diagnosed " 
      I think they going to start demanding formal diagnosis - so for mh issues it would require a psychiatrist or consultant letter - possibly bye passing GPs.
      Having said that I've never encountered anyone with PIP who self diagnosed.
      Just my thoughts.
      As I say - none of us know.
      Try not to worry too much
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    which begs the question - will the Green Paper on PIP reform be the same 'consultation' that the previous Government unveiled last April?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago

    If the Conservatives were still in power, these changes could have been pushed through much faster, without even a second consultation. Labour being elected at least bought some time, and this re-consultation means the process will be delayed further—giving us a chance to keep making our voices heard.

    I know how exhausting it feels to keep going in the face of such relentless pressure, but this ruling proves we are not powerless. Together, we’ve seen that the system can be challenged, and I believe the more we speak up, the harder it will be for them to ignore us. Every delay matters—it’s time we can use to prepare, push back, and support each other.

    Let’s not give up. These setbacks don’t define us, and we’ve come too far to let them break us now.


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @CaroA Well said. Let's stick together and keep 'pushing back'.
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.