A sitting Labour MP – though possibly not for much longer - has launched a petition against his own party’s benefits cuts.

Richard Burgon, Labour MP for Leeds east since 2015 and a shadow minister under Jeremy Corbyn, started the petition four days ago on the change.org platform.  It calls for the Green Paper benefits cuts to be axed and replaced by a wealth tax.  It reads:

This petition, demanding a Wealth Tax instead of devastating cuts to disability support, will be presented in the House of Commons before any votes on welfare cuts.

We oppose the Government’s plan to balance the books by targeting disabled people and the most disadvantaged in our society.

Slashing disability benefits instead of taxing extreme wealth is a political choice—and it is the wrong choice.

Instead, we believe that the very wealthiest should be made to pay their fair share.

A 2% Wealth Tax on assets over £10 million could raise up to £24 billion per year. That’s far more than the £5 billion the Government claims it will “save” by cutting key financial support for disabled people.

We call on the Government to abandon these cruel cuts and, instead of punishing the poorest, to implement a Wealth tax on the very wealthiest.

By this morning it had gathered 18,000 signatures.

You can sign Richard Burgon’s petition against benefits cuts here

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Burgon should jack labour in, and make way for another byelection for his seat.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Mr Fibro He and others are better on the inside to fight it from within, shout from the rooftops, influence other Labour MP's to do the same, vote against this and the direction the party is heading.  If they are ignored then they can attempt to take down the leadership and resign as a last resort.  They can also make constant and bigger and bigger waves in the media and national press, embarrass the leadership and the party and tell the public the truth.  Resigning might get one mention in the press and be forgotten about and then all those that resign will be replaced with Starmer supporting right leaning MP's, driving out even more of the left from Labour, which is what Starmer wants.  This is exactly what Starmer has done since he became leader of the party.  Get rid of anyone on the left or those that might refuse to tow the line under the new new Labour.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Thank you Richard for your petition. 

    The Government must stop this cruel and brutal proposal immediately. 

    Signed and circulated. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Richard Burgon in particular, but other notable but few in number compassionate Labour MPs & from other parties, have helped restore my faith in humanity after this government - that I actually voted for - revealed its cruel & heartless underbelly that has rocked my trust in the party that I mistakenly believed actually had a conscience. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    I was wrong to say my Lib Dem MP had not responded to any of my emails about the welfare proposals. Her office sent me a hard copy of her emails, which had gone to my junk email folder. It is encouraging that she says 'so many people have contacted her'.  Here is her most relevant response sent on 25/3:

    Thank you for contacting me about the benefit reforms that were announced on the 18th of March. I have had so many people contact me about this, many of whom are scared about what this means for them and their loved ones. It is a privilege to hear people's deeply personal stories, and these have all been read. However, due to the sheer volume of correspondence I have had I am unable to respond to each story personally. To those of you that this affects, please be assured that I have heard your concerns and will be raising these where possible, as will my Liberal Democrat colleagues. 

    The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) is failing those it is meant to support, and short-term cuts will only deepen that failure. We know the system is broken, and the Liberal Democrats will continue to fight for a welfare system that supports people rather than punishing them. 

    We agree that the welfare bill needs to come down and that we should support more people into work - it's what's right for people and our economy But we don't believe you achieve that by slashing support for disabled people - some of whom will never be able to work - while others need PIP precisely so that they can continue to work. Limiting eligibility for these people will do nothing to get more people into employment. 

    The Lib Dems have long said that the best way to bring down benefits spending is to fix health and social care and fix it quickly. This involves investing in preventative health measures by boosting the public health grant, properly funding mental health support, especially for young people, and reforming social care. That is why it has been so disappointing to see the government's lack of urgency in this area, taking three years to complete their social care review and kicking projects like new hospitals into the long grass. Until that changes, no meaningful drop in the welfare bill will arrive, and the misery that people are suffering will continue. 

    I completely appreciate that people have been thrown into really damaging uncertainty and need clarity as soon as possible, but first we need to actually see the legislation, which hasn't been published yet. We also haven't seen the official impact assessment or the Government's full costings, which will come in the Spring Statement. That said, we've been very clear that some of these announcements are simply wrong, for example cutting PIP for people who need support with daily tasks, and of course that will reflect on how I deal with the legislation when it comes to Parliament. 

    If the Government wants to boost the finances quickly, they could be asking the banks, big tech and online gambling firms to pay a bit more out of their massive profits, rather than going after people with disabilities. 

    Disabled people and those that care for them deserve our support and they deserve clarity from this government. Please be assured that I will do all I can to support my constituents through this extremely worrying time. 

    Yours sincerely,

    Anna Sabine MP
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    I'm not confident that there is enough of an out cry or rebellion against these cuts, even if many aren't happy about it. It's admirable that Richard is speaking out, and I'm sure he will be punished somehow for it. He lost the whip last year because he voted against them regarding the two child benefit cap.

    People have asked him to resign since the party doesn't align with his values. However, if MP's resign over this, there will be no one left to vote against it. So, I don't want him to resign. I want him to use his position to influence people and cause trouble, which is exactly what he is doing!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 16 days ago
      @Greg Thanks for the info, will take a look.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 16 days ago
      @Leah Have a look at a new news article on google, that says several Labour Mps are now getting worried they could lose their seats because of the government wanting to cut disability payments. Type in google uprising against UK Labour government over welfare cuts and read an article by the Gradian reads Electoral wake up call: Dozens of Labour Mps risk losing majority.  Tim my partner found the article and it was interesting to read it. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Leah "However, if MP's resign over this, there will be no one left to vote against it."

      It's ridiculous. Why the hell are they resigning when they know their vote could make a difference.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    I think I have already signed the petition, plus the one which has garnered 100,000 votes and will be debated in Parliament calling for the tax threshold to be increased to £20,000. Of course, Liebour have rejected this citing fiscal reasons (we want your money!)
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 29 days ago
      @Ivan 100% agree!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Mick Mick, Much agree about some kind of ceiling with this. But ultimately I'd look to take the lowest-paid earners out of taxation altogether. What understandably angers so many people is that Labour could do all of this & also avoid welfare cuts with a relatively small tax increase on the wealthiest, who after all have done exceedingly well after 14 years of Tory tax breaks. But, no, instead Starmer & Reeves would rather target the most vulnerable to avoid upsetting their wealthy backers. Both charlatans of very few principles, if any. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Ivan
      Oh yes, absolutely right @Ivan it is a conundrum and maybe they should do it with a cut off point so  those earning above a certain amount don't benefit from it.  Not sure what a fair ceiling would be, maybe £70k.

      A tax on assets, wealth tax, windfall taxes on profits, taxes on banks on pre tax profits, etc. Instead of cuts and austerity 2.0.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Mick Another take on this: not increasing the tax threshold penalises the lowest paid the most. Increasing it always brings benefits to our lowest-paid citizens & that outweighs anything else. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Matt The problem with increasing the tax threshold is that the rich all benefit from it as well.  Those at the top then pay even less.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    At least there's someone in the labour party who hasn't forgotten their morals, compassion and decency.  Anyone in the party that doesn't stand against this disgraceful attack on disabled and chronically ill people, should hang their heads in shame and be removed from their position with no pension, benefits or golden handshake.

    How anyone can agree with this and have no conscience is beyond inhuman.  It's sick.  The lowest of the low.  What the hell has our country become.  Full of evil monsters, selfish, greedy, despicable.

    No amount of money is ever enough and many (not all) of the wealthiest are happy to get ever richer off the backs of everyone else.  Playing divide and rule games, turning the working people against the disabled through lies and rhetoric in the brainwashing media.

    This has to be stopped right now and never allowed to happen again in the future.  Changes need to be made to reform the system for the better, not making it worse for the poorest, disabled and vulnerable people.  It is bad enough already and has been terribly unfair, biased and designed to fail and torture for years.  The entire points and descriptor system is a farce, in both PIP and the WCA.  Repeatedly reviewing (torturing people) over and over, lies and complete fabrications by so called health care professionals (where's the health, care or professionalism in these people).  Then there's the sanctions if you don't comply to demands, which you are unable to comply with because you are chronically ill and disabled through no fault of your own.  It is barbaric, it has killed thousands and has no place in our society.  The private assessment companies cost millions, the admin costs millions, the repeated reviews, mandatory reconsiderations and tribunals which find in huge numbers that the health care professionals (costing millions) got it wrong.  All of it costs billions and they're happy to spend it, trying to make out  disabled and chronically ill people are liars, cheats, shirkers and fraudsters, even though their own statistics show there is 0% fraud.  

    Why not spend these billions making lives better and paying a decent, truly liveable amount, so that disabled people can live comfortably?  Not having to live in a state of poverty, constant fear,  anxiety, stress and worrying about when the next DWP torture session is coming through their letterbox?

    This whole thing is disgusting, it's gone on for years. No matter which political party or, otherwise individual, instigates or supports this, it is an abomination and needs to stop!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    There's an awful lot of MPs not happy about the welfare cuts but they would rather suck up and shut up as they want to keep their jobs. If these cuts go ahead then shame on them when people start dying. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 days ago
      @Stu Well, come the next General Election they will all regret it, when they lose their seats. It's time those back bench MPs woke up to the damage Stammer + Rachel Reeves are doing to the Labour Party. The Labour Party is now fast becoming an unelectable party.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @james Me too 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @james Exactly James. They have found money for their two and a half thousand pound rise. I wonder how many will accept that! If they had a conscience they would give it to a disability charity. It has been in the news today(31 March) that a Labour MP Taino Owatemi has claimed £900 pounds so that her dog can live with her in London. And all they can say is she hasn’t broken any rules! The rules want changing. She can afford to pay her own £900 surely on what she earns
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Stu I hope not I hope there are at least a few who will launch a challenge to Starmer's leadership in September and call for the removal of the leadership of the labour party!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Stu don't forget their benefits!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Taxing the rich won't cost the rich their lives.. Cutting sick/disabled people's benefits will cost the sick/disabled their lives.. The choice of which to pick should be obvious, there should be no need for a petition, this just goes to show how cruel the government are.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    The country needs more mps like him,  mps with a backbone to stand up and call something out that is clearly unjust and unfair…a man who clearly hasn’t forgotten the old labour core values…and to make sure the promise of “those with the broadest shoulders should bear the heaviest burden” is delivered on.  Good on him.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Well I,ve signed the petition through the link. Do we think this will change things at all? I hope so, can,t stop myself dwelling on the changes ahead.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Hightower Me too I get UC/LCWRA so I'll be completely wiped out if these proposals go through any where near what they are intending 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Supporting this and circulated to everyone I know.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Well done that man.
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.