The DWP has published the results of a survey today which they claim shows that 200,000 people claiming health and disability benefits are ready for work now, if the right job or support were available.

The survey has been released to coincide with time To Talk day, which encourages people to talk about their mental health.  Its findings include:

  • 27% of customers felt they might be able to work in future but only if their health improved. Customers with mental health conditions were more likely to feel this way: 44% of customers whose main health condition was a mental health condition felt they might be able to work again if their health improved.
  • 5% - approximately 200,000 - customers felt they could work right away if the right job or support was available. Customers whose main health condition was a cognitive or neurodevelopmental impairment—including memory and concentration problems  alongside learning difficulties and disabilities, as well as autism—were around twice as likely to feel this way compared to other customers.
  • 49% of customers felt they would never be able to work or work again. 62% of these customers were over the age of 50, and 66% felt their health was likely to get worse in the future.
  • The findings indicate a link between take up of health and disability benefits and challenges in the healthcare system: two in five customers (41%) were on a waiting list for treatment for their health condition(s), and half (50%) who were out of work felt their ability to work was dependent on receiving treatment.
  • There is a potential opportunity in the rise of homeworking. A quarter (25%) of customers felt they couldn’t work, but when asked if they could work from home said they could. But customers were worried about the risk of social isolation and tended to see homeworking as a stepping stone to in-person work.
  • A key challenge is the complex relationship many customers have with DWP. Of those customers not in work who didn’t rule out work permanently, 60% were worried that DWP would make them look for unsuitable work, and 50% were worried they would not get their benefits back if they tried working.

Work and Pensions Secretary, Liz Kendall MP said:

“Today’s report shows that the broken benefits system is letting down people with mental health conditions who want to work.

“People claiming Health and Disability benefits have been classed by the system as “can’t work” and shut out of jobs and have been ignored – when they’ve been crying out for support.

“That is a serious failure. It’s bad for people, bad for businesses, which miss out on considerable talent, and bad for the economy.”

Whilst the fear of losing benefits if you try work is clearly a failing of the benefits system, the lack of suitable jobs and appropriate support within the workplace seems to have a great deal more to do with employment rights than it does with benefits.

But the main aim purpose of this survey, as far as the government is concerned, is undoubtedly to support whatever changes are proposed when the Green Paper is finally published in the Spring.

You can read more about the Work Aspirations of Health and Disability Claimants survey here.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 months ago
    Still says w c a and pip no mention at all for people in the e s a support group my husband was disabled at 30 after 13 months married he has now got so many things wrong from what started a back
    Injury to aniexty depression heart disease asthma c o p d high b p rushed into hospital with double phuemonia that's caused terrible resp issues and heart failure people are doing home visits he's housebound he suffered a seizure never had one in his life and they say horrible things this government has a lot to answer for when passing judgement when asked the question was Liz Kendal
    Going to means test pip no comments I would add my husband is now 58 and always  struggled to prove his illness I have cared for him for 27 yrs as well as worked been an un paid carer they don't look at that do they no words needed but I would like an answer for e s a support group
    Liz Kendall I'm waiting 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 months ago
      @Un known A lot of what is being said is speculation. You have to ask yourself whether what is being said in the media is an actual fact or an opinion? We'll just have to wait a few more weeks to hear from the horses mouth so to speak what's happening.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 months ago
    Always bare this in mind, well it's what I've been telling myself after near enough 2 years of media propaganda. They want to target the cohort of 18-25 year olds who are on benefits (Not disability benefits), then they want to target depression and anxiety sufferers, lastly they want to target people who defraud the benefit system (Not disability benefits).

    I don't like the depression/anxiety one because it downplays the severity of the illness, it's like a poison nettle which left untreated becomes a slew of nettles.

    Labour's attacks on benefits are usually found on more Conservative leaning outlets, one of the main reasons why is the rise of the Reform Party. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 months ago
      @John Forest Who? Keir Starmer?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 months ago
      @Dpb999 Could we crowdfund a  a disability or human rights  lawyer to take them on ? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 months ago
      @Dpb999 The disabled community is fragmented all talk no action
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 months ago
      @Dave Dee True
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 months ago
      @axab43 That's a great point, the media in particular the Times, Mail, Telegraph and such have gone on about "Mental Illness is the new bad back" as meat thrown to the wolves in their comment sections but we know how incapacitating it is. 

      I feel sorry for people with mobility issues but I admire them for their fight and perseverance. I don't think the likes of Fraser Nelson understands that such issues can happen in a blink of an eye and it could take anyone out of work.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 months ago
    Allegedly, only 3401 benefit recipients took part in this (again alleged) survey and they have discovered 200,000 are ready for work!!! 
    Make it make sense! 

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 months ago
    From the main topics the cabinet meeting discussed today was the sickness and disability benefits. I think this meeting will pave the way for the long waited announcements. We need, disabled people and carers, to have a say in the coming consultation and do not let them pass their damaging proposals.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 months ago
    If they're really serious about the support they keep parroting and want to support those who are willing to work, then, their support should go way beyond the usual help with CV writing and preparing for interviews for jobs which people won't get. They should rather focus on finding work placements that secure at the end of a short period of time an employment.

    Like in Nordic countries and the Netherlands, the DWP staff  should deal themselves directly with employers and secure jobs for the people in this category, rather than asking people to apply for tonnes of jobs in vain, saying to them. "Keep applying, you never know."

    No one should need an argumentative work coach with a patronising attitude for CV writing or preparing for interviews, as there are plenty of ready made CV templates on the internet and tantamount of job interview preparation guides on YouTube.

    I don't think they've got a shred of honesty in supporting anyone; all they want is to cut the welfare bill by cutting benefits in one form or another.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 months ago
      @Scorpion They used to help disabled people my daughter is disabled, 14 year ago when she turned 18 and had to claim sickness, they said she didnt need to work?  I insisted they didnt write her of. She went to a disabled college that was set up to help disabled people into work. They had 6 up and down the country. My daughter couldnt go to normal college but this gave her the oppotunite to learn. She went on placement at the end of training with an employer who worked with the DWP, making sure everything was going ok, she has been there 13 year now. So yes I agree people can work with disabilities, if the support is there. DWP stopped funding these places. They used to have Remploy but DWP stopped funding. They want people back to work but dont want to fund and support them.
      My daughter has Autism ADHD and other mental health problems, also scoliosis and head tumour disabled people can work. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 months ago
      @Scorpion Would be good if the government helped companies in creating jobs for disabled persons to do in the first place which means investment and helping employers to achieve this through incentives, money, and resources!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 months ago
      @WorkshyLayabout So true.  Private company involvement is a duplication of existing services. Why are they needed? Why is money wasted on them ?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 months ago
      @Matt @Matt The government is quite happy to give £millions to private companies doing WCAs as well as how many £s to providers now running job clubs. That money should be used on improving job centres and services for those genuinely looking for work. However spending taxpayers' money on something useful is off the government's radar.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 months ago
      @Scorpion true
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 months ago
    A "complex relationship with DWP" - by this I assume you mean that we avoid them at all costs, as they will twist anything and everything we say. 

    I remember that just turning up to a WCA shows that you're able to travel, yet if you didn't show up you got no money. 

    So yeah I try to avoid speaking to them unless I absolutely have to. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 months ago
    This survey is intended to justify and pave the way for their upcoming wicked plan, while distorting the reality.


  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 months ago
    I worked in market research for over 20 years.
    I'd like to know how they selected their sample.
    For the results of a survey to be accurate you have to talk to carefully selected people for an accurate overall result.
    It would take me an age to explain these variable but as an example - within age groups there'd have to be representation of condition severity.
    There'd have to be accurate representation of differing conditions.
    To select this sample to be accurate would be complex and time consuming.
    3,000 people questioned is laughable.
    Therefore I do not believe this to be worth the paper it's written on.
    Purely a propaganda tool ahead of next months announcement. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 months ago
      @Jon I did Statistics at quite a high level for A level Geography and Psychology. If the report was presented in any credible scientific journal it would be declined for publication for the reasons above.  There's no hypothesis, no statistical analysis or confidence level set which you must provide in areas such as medical research. Then again, this is the Government and its employees.....
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 months ago
    Maybe we should just ignore what Liz Kendall says in headline grabbing statements she knows will cause controversy?  She has to work through the assessment criteria, and those people who are genuine and will pass the criteria won't be made to work, whatever Liz Kendall may want to do. 

    Treat these comments with the contempt they deserve and just ignore her. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 months ago
      @axab43 Yes I agree with that as somebody who worked in tribunal representation for many years but tribunals have to apply the law as it is at the time and if Liz Kendall changes the way that people's impairments are recognised or weighted by a revised assessment system those people might not succeed with an appeal however self-evident it is that they are  in the real world actually or virtually unemployable. There are plenty of people with disabilities who work but asking employers to contemplate accommodating hundreds of thousands of people currently regarded as unemployable by the assessment system is not practicable.  The whole thing is not really about the well-being of currently benefit claiming disabled people getting back into the world of work possibly to be better off economically socially and in their health it simply about saving money.   
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 months ago
      @axab43 Fair enough. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 months ago
      @Anon That is because many people fill the assessment papers  in in a way that will make them fail.  

      Welfare Rights Advisers from Citizens Advice Bureaux told me they continually come upon people who get no points in the first assessment  but pass when going to Tribunal, when advised by the right people or when the CAB advisors fill the papers in for them.   You agreed with that yourself, because the DWP want to fail people but when it goes to Tribunal they pass. 

      Liz Kendall can't stop that, however much she may want to.

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 months ago
      @Jonno I meant she should be ignored as far as letting what she says affect us!  Ie not to let how she talks affect how we worry over what will happen.  As I said in my original comment, she cannot bypass the assessment process and find everyone fit for work whether they are or not.

      Absolutely she should be challenged and probably will be, by those more qualified and stronger to than we are.  There are many who are challenging these reforms, ie many disability charities and other bodies.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 months ago
      @axab43 "She has to work through the assessment criteria, and those people who are genuine and will pass the criteria won't be made to work, whatever Liz Kendall may want to do."

      Sorry, but this is laughable. It's dependent on DWP being honest and doing their job properly. They're after cutting costs, so it doesn't matter if we are genuine or not. 

      How many genuinely disabled people entitled to PIP get refused and have to go all the way to court to appeal??
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 months ago
    Mrs 4% thinks some benefit claimants are "taking the mickey". Appalling language.  Apologies if this link has already been posted.

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 months ago
      @Jonno Yeah, I read that too, shameful.  Sure, *some* must be playing the system but didn't Resolution Foundation say health benefits are the most difficult to play the system with and not the place where there's likely to be fraud.  Disgusting how they ran with this comment (and shame on BBC too)... just look at the people's comments below the article.  It got the reaction they wanted from the DM reader types.  It makes me feel scared, hopeless and hated.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 months ago
      @Jonno So much for all her talk about ending the blame culture!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 months ago
      @jossy There are as many as a percentage of politicians taking the mickey as benefit claimants.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 months ago
    "Today’s report shows that the broken benefits system is letting down people with mental health conditions who want to work."

    No, it doesn't.
    What it shows is that every other system is letting people down with mental health conditions who want to work. The benefits system isn't keeping them out of work, it's employers and the rest of society who can't or won't make the reasonable adjustments required by disabled workers. 

    The things that needs fixing in the benefits system are the woefully low rates, sanctions for minor infractions, and extremely biased assessment process designed purely around declining claims wherever possible. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 months ago
      @SL All I can say on that one is that the NHS mh talking g therapies is an absolute waste if time,I jyat gad 6 sessions at so called level 3 and nothing has been sorted out,they can't prescribe antidepressants or anti anxiety drugs,they cant come to your house when your agoraphobia won't let you attend,mist of my appointments were over the phone,you gave to fill in a form online about your feeling and your anxiety level scores and I was told at week 5 my scores havnt come up and they should have,really? When I can't get out?it's all about their stats and if you're not improving the therapist looks bad! Well I'm afraid being told to not count you're feelings about an imminent family members death is just wrong on so many levels!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 months ago
      @SL Brilliantly put, thanks!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 months ago
    In Dec 2024 there was the biggest drop in jobs since the highest drop in covid lockdown. So the was something like 200k less jobs in Dec 2024, and worst covid lockdown drop was 400k. And with Labour budget policy the job market is going to get much worse and maybe as bad as highest lockdown job losses. Also retail and high street is on the brink of economic collapse. Therefore how on earth does this gov 'get disabled people working' even make any sense. This narrative would need a thriving economy to even work. Plus the gov is in this mess because of all the hundreds of billions of public money they have given to their private company and bank chums. We would be living in a Utopia if the gov never gave any taxpayer money to private companies and banks since 2008.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 months ago
      @Bert That was my employment background. My healths really gone down the swanee since then. Some of my former clients were in a better state than me now. I'd love to be well again and able to it now. Not just for the money, for the social side as well. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 months ago
      @Bert Bert there are 812,000 and yes the majority are in care.  I suspect the number of available vacanies will drop because it wasn't that long ago that it was the figure you quoted.  I think this government and this country in general are in freefall.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 months ago
      @Edward We would not be living in utopia because if that public money hadn't been spent on private companies in Banks they wouldn't have given it to us.  And when it was politically convenient we would still have been scapegoated with the collaboration of most of the media
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 months ago
      @Edward There are 818 thousand job vacancies most of them in care work
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 months ago
    A survey of 3,401 of health and disability benefit customers. How long have we been customers rather than claimants? Do I get a loyal card and money off coupons? I guess the DWP terms them as sanctions...

    Might/could/would work is not the same as can/capable of work. 

    5% of "customers" surveyed felt they could work straight away obviously means 95% feel they cannot. If my maths is correct, that 95% works out in real terms as 3,800,000 "customers".

    (5% of 3,401 surveyed = 170
     95% of 3,401 surveyed = 3,231

    170 becomes 200,000 therefore 3,231 becomes 3,800,000.)

    The DWP is using the answers of 3,401 people to represent the views of 4 million. 3,401 is 0.085% of 4,000,000. For the survey to be statistically valid, it should be at least 5% of 4 million. In other words, 20,000 people minimum needed surveying.

    Now for my own short survey : is Liz Kendall doing a good job? Answers are 1.) NO; 2.) NO; 3.) NO. Please choose wisely. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 months ago
      @WorkshyLayabout You're correct 
      I worked in research for over 20 years.
      There's no way this is representative.
      3,000 respondents plucked at random I'm guessing.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 months ago
    They always misinterpret the data to serve thier agenda and this misinterpretation is considered a lie so I do not know how on earth they get away with this deception that may ruins hundreds of thousands of disabled people's lives. The political system is broken and provides a cover for the deciving and curropted politicians to get away with his lies and curroptions. You will never find a politician taken to court for his actions in office but you will find many thousands of carer allowance receipients taken to courts for unintentional mistakes. 

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 months ago
    Looks like they are looking at one health assessment for universal credit health element and pip rolled in one 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 months ago
    News alert just seen in papers daily telegraph sir kier starmer axes reform plans for the sick note reform is this a turning point hopefully at last some good news 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 months ago
      @Paul What I'm reading I think they are changing the pip system probably putting it into categories because you can work on pip and probably tightening up lcwra group I'm an amputee and have serious rheumatoid arthritis dunno what they gonna only speculation at the moment but I ain't exactly a mountain goat 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 months ago
      @Diceman24 Cannot find this in the Telegraph. Link please?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 months ago
    Well if that is true, fabulous, get them a job (good luck finding employers willing to employ them). I suspect that if they are extrapolating the figures from the number who responded their figures are going to be rather skewed. No need to penalise those who are unemployable by cutting their benefits 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 months ago
      @Jane @Jane a lot of people haven’t worked for 10+ years that’s a long time to be out of work and some are over 50 too also every job will need an interview 2 references and a work history 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 months ago
    Does anyone know if taking away money from people who receive the £400 benefit a month could be challenged legally? I keep wondering if it could be challenged on human rights grounds. If anyone affected chipped in to a Crowdfund to hire someone from The Good Law Project for example, there'd be plenty to pay for a decent legal counsel I'd imagine due to the sheer number of people that would be affected. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 months ago
    PIP Update from the Independent




    " However, these changes to PIP will come instead as part of the government’s previously announced Health Transformation Programme.

    Launched by the previous Conservative administration, the programme intends to simplify the PIP application process. It will also introduce a new single health assessment service for all benefits that require a functional health assessment, with a national rollout planned for 2029.

    Sir Stephen said: “the Health Transformation Programme is modernising health and disability benefit services, to improve people’s experience of applying for PIP. The Programme will transform the entire PIP service, from finding out about benefits through to decisions, eligibility, and payments.”

    “The Programme communicates and engages frequently with disabled people and external stakeholders – including national charities and other organisations that support people with disabilities – about proposed changes. Their opinions and suggestions are taken on board as we test new iterations of the transformed service.”


Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.