The first DWP oral questions in the House of commons yesterday failed to shed any light at all on the government’s attitude to personal independence payment (PIP) vouchers or the timetable for managed migration of employment and support allowance (ESA) claimants to universal credit (UC). But it did allow Labour to publish 31 formerly secret benefits reports in order to embarrass the Conservatives.

Many claimants had hoped, and much of the media had claimed, that Liz Kendall would use her first oral questions to reveal the government’s plans for PIP, and in particular whether a voucher scheme was to go ahead.

In fact, there was not a single question on this issue or on managed migration.  Instead, the opposition concentrated its fire on winter fuel allowance, where they see Labour as being most vulnerable.  And Labour MPs largely asked questions they knew ministers would be happy to answer.

It now seems likely that claimants will have to wait until the end of the month, for the budget and the probable publication of the “Getting Britain Working” white paper, to discover what Labour has in store.

The release of the 31 reports was presented as a new era of transparency at the DWP.   In reality, many of the documents are now very old and of limited value.  Meanwhile, there has been no sign of the DWP responding any more quickly or readily to freedom of information requests under Labour than it was under the Conservatives.

So, mostly this data dump was piece of political theatre, although a report on the huge barriers faced by ESA claimants in relation to work is possibly even more relevant today than it was when the data was originally collected a decade ago. 

Benefits and Work has not had time to go through all of the reports, but those listed below may be of interest to readers. If you find any valuable information please do pass it on via email or in the comments below.

Barriers to Accessing Health Support for PIP, NS ESA, and UC Claimants

Experiences of PIP applicants who received zero points at assessment

Take up and use of the Universal Credit Advance Payment

The Impact of Fluctuating Health Conditions on Assessment

Specialism in the Health Assessment: Initial Exploratory Research

Not Started and Unfinished Claims to Universal Credit (UC Hesitancy Research)

A health, social and economic profile of ESA recipients: Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey 2014

The full collection of reports can be found at these two links:  DWP research reports and DWP ad hoc research

You can watch DWP oral questions on parliamentlive.tv

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Brian Marriott · 22 hours ago
    We will not no knoe now till 3035
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Ann · 1 days ago
    According to sky news they are thinking about saving back the weight loss jabs for overweight pip claimants to get them back into work  
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    John · 1 days ago
    Hi is there any news on pip being means tested I work part time and get pip if pip does get means tested I will lose my pip as I will be classed as earning too much money please can someone answer this question for me please pip is a lifeline for me as I live on my own
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Jon · 1 days ago
    It's looking like labour are going to bottle it over benefits they have only so much political goodwill and credit to use up
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Jonno · 1 days ago
      @Rik Very true. People can't seem to get their head around the fact that people get sick.

      By a quirk of fate they could easily be in the same position themselves but seem unable to empathise with anyone not in their position.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Rik · 1 days ago
      @Jon The public are very anti welfare for working aged people. So don’t agree that Labour will u-turn on disability benefits reform.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      MrFibro · 1 days ago
      @Jon Let's hope so.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    CaroA · 1 days ago
    https://www.resolutionfoundation.org/publications/cutbacks-ahead/

    Resolution foundation warnings to government....
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    CaroA · 2 days ago
    https://www.thecanary.co/uk/news/2024/10/11/dwp-pip-axed/

    Explains how they/ corporate media are exploiting our worries.....
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      welshval · 2 days ago
      @CaroA Thanks for this I hope many others on here read it It's a terrible indictment of the way we are all manipulated by unscrupulous corporations and it's so helpful that you have pointed this out
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Anonymouse · 2 days ago
      @CaroA Thank you for posting this! These outlets running speculation that PIP would be means-tested like the government was seriously considering it is a particularly egregious example of this kind of exploitation. Well done to The Canary for running a piece on this and trying to reassure people.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Eloise · 3 days ago
    Apparently Reeves is defending her decision to cut the Winter Fuel Allowance, because otherwise she would have had to cut support for disabled people and claimed "There's no way I'm doing that". Whether that's true or not, I don't know. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      CC · 1 days ago
      @Eloise Not true I think, Labour have said multiple times they are reforming sickness benefits, and they have put Liz Kendall in the chair, they are devolving employment support to councils for them to do the dirty deeds.

      All the building blocks are in place for the upcoming cuts, the question is which specific people will they target.

      The only thing Reeve has confirmed is they have no intention to change PIP payments to vouchers, however that didnt surprise me at all, I think the vouchers in the consultation was planted as a decoy to grab the attention, the real plans will be to change the criteria for claiming PIP, which is also in the consultation but has had far less scrutiny because of the vouchers.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Neal · 3 days ago
    This is what Sir Timms and Ms Kendall have promised people with disabilities regarding the changes in the PIP, next spring 2025.

    What are the proposed PIP reforms?

    Consultations on the future of PIP began under the previous Conservative government. When Labor won the election, they said they would consider the results of the consultation before deciding on their next steps.

    What changes are being considered?

    Tiered payments

    One option considered during the consultation was the Norwegian model, in which people are awarded tiered payments depending on their individual condition and specific needs. Under the Norwegian ‘Basic Benefit’, payments are made based on the severity of the patient’s condition, equipment, clinical needs and other support. A maximum of six levels are suggested.

    Change of eligibility criteria

    Another option being considered is to make changes to the eligibility criteria to make them more targeted. This could make it more difficult for people with certain conditions to receive benefits, while improving access for others. The consultation document suggests it aims to extend the qualifying period for PIP to better understand the impact of long-term conditions and enable the identification of short-term conditions from which there can be a “full recovery”.

    Reconstruction of the assessment process

    Changing the unpopular PIP assessment process could mean it focuses more on a person’s condition or disability, rather than arbitrary tests to check whether a person is mobile and independent. This may require an assessment by someone with more detailed health knowledge.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      CC · 1 days ago
      @Sadly Simon A bigger focus on diagnosis isnt positive in my opinion, there is many people who have problems that either have no diagnosis or a misdiagnosis.  A person shouldnt qualify just because of a diagnosis, and likewise they shouldnt be disqualified just because of a diagnosis either.  Even tow people with the same condition can have very different restrictions on their daily living.

      If they focus on diagnosis how do the people without one get the support they need?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Anon · 3 days ago
      @Neal There's an article in today's (Sunday) Telegraph online stating Liz Kendall has said the cuts are most likely to be, what she calls,  for milder mental health issues.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Sadly Simon · 3 days ago
      @Neal "rather than arbitrary tests to check whether a person is mobile and independent. This may require an assessment by someone with more detailed health knowledge"

      That sounds positive - here's hoping!
      The same assessment needs to be applied to neurological variance as well.
      The last lady I saw for an assessment was near clueless regarding my own issues.
      How many specialists understand the complications of PDA & Austism? Probably 1%-2% ...
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    A · 3 days ago
    Keir Starmer says the Budget on October 30 is  “making people better off.”

    I wonder whether he considers people with long term health conditions and disabled people as part of the people he's referring to!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      MrFibro · 2 days ago
      @A Yes it's only going to make the rich / elite better off.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Anon · 3 days ago
      @A I believe he was referring to working people 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Dave Dee · 4 days ago
    The telegraph readers who are predominantly elderly people with 6 figure sums in their bank accounts WHINE AND CRY about 300 quid for their Winter Fuel Allowance which they'll give to their grandchildren but they drool at disabled people having their benefits cut.

    I'm tired of their whining to be honest. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Anon · 3 days ago
      @Dave Dee There are lots of very wealthy socialists, actors and musicians who are left leaning Guardian readers, they have also been complaining about the cuts to WFA. I actually find the champagne socialist types even more repugnant because they are the biggest hypocrites.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      lesley · 3 days ago
      @Dave Dee
      I am a pensioner, certainly not a telegraph reader (can't afford a newspaper, pick up the free Metro) and certainly do not have a 6 figure sum in my bank account. Am a widow aged 77, was a full time carer until my husband died, thus no second pension only state pension which is topped up with pension credit. Live in a council flat. Fortunately I do not drink alcohol (so no posh wines from Waitrose) nor do I smoke ciggies, so save a fortune. 
      I empathise with what you are saying though, and admire you for saying it out loud.

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      MrFibro · 3 days ago
      @Dave Dee Me too.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Dave Dee · 4 days ago
    From that Telegraph article AH posted below, there really isn't any difference between Labour or the Tories.

    Kendall may revive more Tory proposals

    Ms Kendall has also not ruled out adopting other proposed Tory reforms, including stripping benefits claimants who refuse to get a job because of their handouts.

    Plans to save billions more by tightening access to personal independence payments for mental health sufferers are understood to still be on the table.

    Mel Stride, her Conservative predecessor, unveiled a reform package just before the election that he said would shave £12 billion off the welfare bill.

    In the run-up to the election, Labour focused heavily on cutting NHS waiting lists as a way to bring down the number of people signed off from work with long-term sick.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      boris1 · 3 days ago
      @Dave Dee Mel Stride is disgusting and clueless.
      His comment "down and bluesy" was an absolutely derogatory insult to people suffering genuine mental health issues. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Caroline · 4 days ago
    I am finding it hard waiting to hear from Labour what they are planning to do about PIP.  If I lose PIP then I will not be able to pay for my home and bills and it is causing me sleepless nights.  Labours complete silence on this shows their lack of respect for the disabled.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Sadly Simon · 2 days ago
      @Caroline I don't think they fully understand what goes on in our community. There is often a disconnect, that much is clear. All I can say is that I have dealt with these issues for about 22 years now, after I had a breakdown and lost my job. Since then, aside from a little part time and voluntary work, I am stuck in the welfare system and have been through several changes, where the furniture has been moved around. Each time, I enter a period of bleakness and dread and once had 6 months of perilously low income, yet here I am. There is "usually" (more often than not) a way through Caroline.

      If the state is seen to directly impoverish us and generate more homelessness or the potential for homelessness, they will be forced to act, as the already pressured and crumbling services will be overwhelmed.

      The money is there - when they go to war, all of a sudden "billions" of pounds manifest.

      I hope it works out for you and (lesson to self) - try not to overthink, live in the day.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Henry · 3 days ago
      @Caroline No news until spring apparently 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      boris1 · 3 days ago
      @Caroline Same here Caroline

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Ah · 4 days ago
    “Sickness handouts to be cut for mentally ill under Labour proposal.”
    “Liz Kendall weighs up whether to keep Tory plans restricting benefits that would save £3 billion.”
    “People with mild mental health conditions could lose some of their benefits under plans being considered by ministers to cut welfare spending."

    This is appalling. Anxiety and Depression are considered 'mild'. However it can spiral into 'severe' MH conditions as it did for me. Such a policy will make this happen to other people. This can all be avoided if the Gov went after the elite-wealthy [Billionaires]. Go after them instead of trying to squeeze the vulnerable.


    Go to https://archive.ph/ if you don't have a Telepgraph subscription
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Jonno · 1 days ago
      @Sadly Simon That's very deep. Almost Schoepenhaueresqe.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Sadly Simon · 2 days ago
      @Philc Thank-you Philc.

      I am sure my vision of events is incomplete, as there are so many moving parts and in some ways I don't blame any one of us, including the warmongers (as hard as that can be) - I think, from what I have read and my own understanding, that the universe is chiefly deterministic so in some respects we are witness to and subject to universal entropy. All things appear to have built in obsolescence and tragically(?) we see through history that all monolithic structures crumble.

      Impermanence is a wild ride.

      Regardless of these abstractions, let us hope for positive change for the disaffected and vulnerable, but maybe we are attempting to negotiate with factions who view us as maladaptive or broken cogs that would be better off recycled.

      I regard myself as functionally unusual and haven't found an environment beyond my own four walls where I "feel" comfortable and where I can adequately function without eventual collapse.

      Not my fault - if I existed prior to birth and could view the span of my life up to this point and see the often pointless struggle, I would never have signed the contract.

      We are taught that life is a gift, I beg to differ, life is "always" an imposition.

      Sorry if this is rambling a little - I will go.

      Take care
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Philc · 2 days ago
      @Sadly Simon Thank you, a well presented, and placed post. You took me away with your words, making our lives seem even more controlled as I wished it to be. I do agree with you that we are having our options so reduced, that many do indeed just have enough of what feels like the constant drip drip drip of divisive control that doesn't go away. Your insight , and clear understanding is appreciated.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Sadly Simon · 3 days ago
      @Ah I read that article yesterday and was appalled at the "wording" - but not exactly surprised considering this is The Telegraph.

      Anxiety & depression are "symptoms" and often co-morbid. I am Autistic and have had anxiety problems since a child and also suffer from periods of enervating depression, along with ongoing struggles with OCD.

      I feel ashamed to claim benefits and have very little actual support nowadays, so have to struggle through this difficult culture chiefly alone.

      These articles serve an ideological agenda and the authors of these superficial diatribes surely understand the impact on the vulnerable.

      Regardless of whether there are a minority "swinging the lead" - I would say the majority of claimants have genuine reasons born of necessity to claim.

      They often state the statistical up tick in claims over the past few years as an indication of how the system is being "played" and abused.

      I view this as a lack of vision and comprehension of actual circumstances.

      Over the past few years we have experienced a culture shock - the pandemic was devastating; it served to further isolate us & disconnect us from systems of support and in many instances obliterate those systems. Many businesses were destroyed due to lockdown and the effect of this is still being felt nationwide.

      The economic squeeze has been horrendous these past few years, what with energy prices rising and the knock on effect across other utilities/services and of course food being grossly inflated.

      We also witnessed specific corporations and even members within government taking advantage of the pandemic for economic gain. So while we were collectively forced into a pressure cooker, for the financial elite and those with the "right" connections, it was business as usual. Partygate to the max!

      People "checking out" is natural - this is a culture in decline. We witness corruption and profiteering off the back of the common man, we see their war games, legitimised through the rags that masquerade as honest journalism (we peer through a distorted lens at world events). The war machine is a devilish obscenity and the elite are knee-deep in the muck of it all. Think about the cost of maintaining that hideous entity; one ballistic missile alone can cost 10s of £1000s.

      At every turn we are prodded, poked and penetrated without compunction by social engineers embedded within high finance who slavishly shill for the betterment of their masters coffers while suckling the rancid nipple.

      Toxic celebrity culture, conspicuous consumerism, animals slaughtered by the billions annually in incomprehensible squalor, culture wars raging, cities overflowing, the job market more cut-throat than ever, the insidious imposition of AI further decimating specific employment sectors, home ownership now a pipe-dream for many, a crisis in the rental market ... and on and on we go.

      So yes - people are checking out in greater numbers and depression is on the rise - what a surprise!

      Kingdoms rise and kingdoms fall and those of us with innate sensitivity feel the turbulence of this world more so than others.

      There is no quick fix or easy answer to any of this unfortunately, in my view, and all I can hope for as times get tough for many of us, is for a little compassion to shine through. A glimmer of reason, truth and love to warm our hearts again and guide us to calm waters as we weather the coming storm.

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Anonymouse · 3 days ago
      @Ah It's worth noting that The Telegraph is a renowned Tory rag and is infamous for writing this kind of tripe on people who claim benefits. It wasn't too long ago they wrote an article whining that people were 'being directed on how to commit benefit fraud' when they were actually seeking help and advice with their benefits on certain internet communities, even though said communities have a cast iron rule against that sort of talk under threat of being banned.

      I honestly would take all of this with the tiniest grain of salt. Like I stated in a comment below, news outlets like this are just out to terrify people ahead of the Budget. Labour have also already stated that they're not going to cut anybody's benefits if they genuinely cannot work or if going into work does not work out for them. "People who can work, should work" refers to those who wish to work but are unable to do so because they've been stuck on an NHS waiting list for years on end, because the Tories are all about privatisation and refused to entertain any notion of sorting that particular issue out.

      If you scroll down to the bottom of the article, you'll find that a government source refused to comment on any of this tosh so I firmly believe it's entirely some heartless megalomaniac's fantasy piece. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    darinfan · 4 days ago
    I am cautiously optimistic with regards to the future of PIP and (hopefully) the abandoning of the voucher scheme.  Part of this comes from Stephen Timms' comments in September when talking about the responses to the proposals made by the Tory government.  He said that the volume of replies "demonstrates the depth of feeling about the previous government's proposals. I thank the British public, as well as the numerous charities and organisations who responded on behalf of their members, for the time and effort taken to share their thoughts and views.  Whilst engaging with responses I can confirm that responses to the set of proposals on the reform of Personal Independence Payments was mixed and for some proposals consistently negative." 

    Presumably the proposals that were greeted with "consistently negative" responses were those surrounding the voucher scheme.  Now, I know that Labour's time in office isn't going so smoothly as some would have hoped, but they would have to be utterly stupid to admit the "consistently negative" responses...and then plough ahead anyway.  And this is even more the case since they published the 31 old reports on Monday of this week - they are making a point of being transparent within the DWP, so presumably those responses from claimants and charities will be made public at some time in the future (or, at least, a report based on them).  Again, admitting something was received in a negative way, proving it,  and then going ahead isn't exactly a good look.  Plus they already know the backlash from the winter fuel payment issue.  That's £200 a year.  Imagine the outcry if they dropped £700 a month payments from the disabled and ill.  Actually, scrub that, as many of the public think we're scroungers and deserve what's coming.

    That doesn't mean I'm not concerned.  Like many, I don't like "not knowing" and it plays my mental health up - especially with the expected move to UC next year as well.  But deep down, I just can't see a voucher scheme making sense given the above...or, indeed, the fact that it could never work, as most of us know already.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Dave · 3 days ago
      @darinfan I agree with you, but I’m still anxious. I’m a life long Labour voter. I recently got awarded pip after many years of being rejected unfairly. If Labour take away the independence and dignity I’ve finally been given, I’ll never ever vote for them again. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Ah · 3 days ago
      @darinfan Are there any other Countries that have a voucher system for benefits?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Diceman24 · 4 days ago
    Perhaps if the disabled white paper is delayed till spring 2025 perhaps that’s a positive news but labour have realised if they try to cut disability benefit to much at moment they would get such a backlash from it especially after cutting pensioners winter fuel allowance of £500 a year where pip would be massive loss to disabled people during this time of cost of living crisis it would make labour worse than they have been lately plus least the longer they take the longer they will do it with the charity help and other disability groups perhaps there is a silver lining after all we all have to wait and see fingers crossed thank you for reading my comment 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Lill · 4 days ago
    I think people should email Rachael reeves and Keir starmer to make more noise about the reform  and say why it's not a good idea apparently the labour government are starting to get squeamish on the benefits reform the more people complain and explain why they shouldn't do it it will hopefully put more pressure to stop them going through with it  their email address for their one for parliament can be googled there's also now rumours going around that nobody will find out about the disability reforms til next year in march or April.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Jonno · 4 days ago
    https://www.disabilitynewsservice.com/dwp-sets-strict-april-2025-universal-credit-deadline-for-all-disabled-people-receiving-tax-credits/

    Interesting article by John Pring. It originally references the April 2025 cut off for tax credits but later on in the article mentions that people not on tax credits are being migrated later which we already knew.

    The article goes on to mention the following below:

    "It said it did not plan to finish issuing migration notices to all claimants of legacy benefits until December 2025, with a final deadline for all households to move to universal credit by March 2026, about 18 months away."

    This is different to what we knew in that the supposed date for everyone to be migrated was  December 2025.

    I wonder who Pring's sources are?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Jonno · 4 days ago
      @Nightcity Let's hope so. I'd love to see the entire process shelved but that's not very realistic. I think the best we can hope for is a delay. If I were in the government's shoes I would start it at the beginning of 2027 and complete it by April 2028.

      There is likely to be a GE in that year and as Labour has such a big majority they probably will call a snap election in that year.

      They could present the migration as a success story in the right-wing press, and although the stress on the sick and disabled being forced to migrate would make a mockery of that claim, it is the perception that counts both in the media and in the wider public.

      The sick, disabled and poor are just collateral damage in this country sadly.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Nightcity · 4 days ago
      @Rik they've never reached a deadline yet, I doubt they'll make this one. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Jonno · 4 days ago
      @Rik Lol. I stand corrected. March 2026 it is. Memo to oneself, Read things carefully. I hope I am in the December 2025 tranche. More time to get my head round this.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Rik · 4 days ago
      @Jonno No, this is what we already knew. The last migration notices are planed for Dec 25, you’re given 3 months from the notice to migrate which takes you to March 26.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Jon · 4 days ago
    Has anyone on this forum had a problem with migrating to universal credit
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Jon · 4 days ago
      @KABTT If you don't mind me asking were you up and running on the system on time or did the process drag on waiting to hear from universal credit
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      KABTT · 4 days ago
      @Jon Yes, it was a nightmare because I wasn't a B&W member when mine happened, with me it was more of a boot off ESA - no letter or help from the CAB and my GP wasn't about so doubly awful.   Soon as all benefits stopped I subbed here to get the guides and advice so I got through it ok, without this site I'd have had major problems.  It was a barbaric process so I'm hoping that others in my situation won't go through it so badly, here we have the right materials and advice to fight back to survive.  So much easier to be well and to enjoy work for our income - being unwell and trying to fight back isn't easy. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    CaroA · 5 days ago
    https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/pip-claimants-limbo-reforms-delayed-3316538

    Says they may be looking to announce changes in spring......
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      boris1 · 3 days ago
      @CaroA I know that will make a lot of claimants more anxious hanging around in limbo even longer not knowing our fate, but It could be viewed as a positive thing because the longer Labour delay making any decisions on welfare reform, the longer we will be able to keep the awards we currently have and the longer it will take for Labour to be able to implement any potential changes.   
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Eloise · 5 days ago
    According to the i, changes to PIP have been delayed until Spring. More waiting...