Labour is to revive the hated Tory plan to force banks to carry out surveillance on claimants’ accounts and give the DWP police type power to search premises and seize possessions.

The Tory provisions were contained in the Data Protection and Digital Information Bill, but this failed to be passed into law before the general election and was therefore scrapped.

Now, however, Labour have announced that they are to include what appear to be very similar provisions in a new Fraud, Error and Debt Bill.

According to the DWP, the new law will give the DWP powers to:

  • Better investigate suspected fraud and new powers of search and seizure so DWP can take greater control investigations into criminal gangs defrauding the taxpayer.
  • Allow DWP to recover debts from individuals who can pay money back but have avoided doing so, bringing greater fairness to debt recoveries.
  • Require banks and financial institutions to share data that may show indications of potential benefit overpayments

The Tory bank surveillance provisions would have forced banks to monitor the accounts of all means-tested benefits claimants and report every time an account went over the capital limit or was used abroad for more than four weeks.

In late 2023, it was estimated that almost 9 million claimants would be caught in the Tory surveillance net, including:

  • 8 million universal credit claimants
  • 6 million employment and support allowance claimants
  • 4 million pension credit claimants

That number is likely to have increased by now, especially with the push to get more people to sign-up for pension credit.

Labour’s new bill will also give the DWP the power to search premises and seize evidence, such as documents, laptops and phones.

The Tory Bill contained similar powers.

It would have allowed designated DWP staff to arrest claimants, search premises and seize any evidence they found without needing to use the police. The DWP said this would put them on a par with HMRC and the Gangmasters and Labour Abuse Authority (GLAA).

In an attempt to reassure claimants, the DWP today claimed that:

“The Bill will also include safeguarding measures to protect vulnerable customers. Staff will be trained to the highest standards on the appropriate use of any new powers, and we will introduce new oversight and reporting mechanisms, to monitor these new powers. DWP will not have access to people’s bank accounts and will not share their personal information with third parties.”

Labour claim that these powers will only be used against criminal gangs.  But, until we see the text of the bill, we will have no way of knowing whether the law will actually prevent the DWP using their new powers against individual claimants if they so choose.

The outline of the new bill was published today by the DWP to coincide with Kier Starmer’s first speech as prime minister to a Labour party conference.

In his speech, Starmer made only a brief reference to the new bill, saying, “If we want to maintain support for the welfare state, then we will legislate to stop benefit fraud and do everything we can to tackle worklessness.”

Back in April of this year the then prime minister, Rishi Sunak, outlined his plan to give the DWP police powers.  He did this whilst setting out his five point plan for welfare reform in a speech at the right-wing think tank, the Centre for Social justice, founded by Iain Duncan-Smith.

Just five months later, Keir Starmer has announced similar measures, this time in a speech to the Labour party conference.

The other four Sunak points were:

  • The WCA to be made harder to pass
  • GPs no longer to issue fit notes
  • Legacy benefits claimants to move to UC sooner and work requirements to be increased
  • PIP no longer always a cash benefit and fewer people to be eligible

We will now have to wait for Labour’s welfare reform white paper to see whether any of the four remaining points will also be adopted as Labour policy.

An outline of the new Fraud, Error and Debt Bill can be found here.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    "Require banks and financial institutions to share data that may show indications of potential benefit overpayments"

    This appears to be a very low threshold, basically if the DWP suspect "potential benefit overpayments" the can request a claimants bank account

    Labour are finished already please write to your MPs and state you have No confidence in this Goverment and request they vote against this legislation or they will lose your vote 

    We won't take lessons from Freebies Starmer 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Labour Out I wouldn't bank on labour being finished the general public don't like benefit claimants either job seekers or sickness related
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Early this year, the previous Tory government responded to a petition in regards to their plans on giving DWP powers to check bank accounts.

    "This measure does not give DWP access to claimants’ bank accounts and will only flag information if it is relevant to someone’s eligibility for the benefits they are receiving."


    This is going to prompt a legal challenge; unfortunately, the UK Supreme Court does not have powers to strike down UK primary legislation but can issue a declaration of incompatibility by a UK Supreme Court judge that a statute is incompatible with the European Convention of Human Rights under the Human Rights Act 1998, Section 4.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Disabled Rights this petition is closed
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Disabled Rights Thanks for the link, which I read. 
      I hope it does provoke a legal challenge, but I don't see how. Would you explain, please?

      I understand that the *banks* -who already have access to claimants' accounts- are the third party who will gather data to pass to DWP. 

      Banks already have unexpected and concerning powers.
      They are required to collect the tax numbers of foreign nationals and hold them on record. My understanding is that they use them to flag international money laundering, and pass that flag to International Corruption Unit. 
      If it is already legal for this to happen, then how would it be a contravention of Sec 4 for the banks to pass data to DWP? 


  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Labour are scrabbling about for money mind you we have had flat growth in the economy for the last two months
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    The DWP should not have police powers, they are not the police. Disgusting!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Zainab 40 years ago I worked for them, there was a fraud squad in house, they had warrants and could enter your home. If you’re being investigated they can look at your bank accounts anyway. This will be the banks notifying dwp if you have unusual activity, are out of the country for more than a month or have savings over the threshold which is all fair enough really. I have no issue with that and as most of us are honest we shouldn’t have any problems.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    We are turning into a one party stasi police state!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    One day I hope these powers will be used to seek out and deal with criminal politicians! 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    The war on welfare recipients continues
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    They are tories…labour was never like that In the past.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    So we've been rebranded from 'muggers and skivers' to 'waste'. Doesn't feel much better tbh. They will never understand how it feels when you have no choice and all you hear is how much of a burden you are.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    What is also mentioned in The Times is claimants time aboard will be watched and reported. And if they are away for more than 4 weeks, they'll be sanctioned. There's no further detail given, but this sounds like Boarder Force will have claimants passports on a database.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @micksville To think that labours birth as a political party, was bought about because of poverty and want among the poor working class, l never thought that labour would be the one to help to forfill Jesus's words "the poor will always be with you."
      Now we have 2 main party's who's cruelty knows no bounds, does anyone have a spare rubber dingy to cross  the English Channel 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Rik This was in the original tory proposals All it means is banks will be required to flag to DWP if you spend on a debit/credit card for more then 4 weeks abroad.In this sense it hasn't changed


Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.