The DWP have revealed the draft criteria they will be using to select claimants for the Severe Disability Group, which will allow fast-track claims for disability benefits.  Benefits and Work would like to know if readers with severe, lifelong conditions think they would meet the criteria.

What is the Severe Disability Group?

The purpose of the Severe Disability Group is to improve the disability benefits assessment process for claimants who have conditions which are severely disabling, lifelong and with no realistic prospect of recovery.

Claimants who fit the criteria will not need to complete a detailed application form or go through a face-to-face assessment in order to claim personal independence payment (PIP) or to be found to have limited capability for work-related activity (LCWRA) for employment and support allowance (ESA0 or universal credit (UC).

The introduction of a Severe Disability Group was first consulted on in the Health and Disability green paper in 2021.

The resulting Health and Disability white paper published in 2023 revealed that design and testing of the Severe Disability Group had already begun.

The DWP have now announced that they are widening the testing of the Severe Disability Group, with two separate tests taking place, both relating to PIP.  There is more on this below.

How the Severe Disability Group works

Where a claimant is considered likely to meet the criteria for the Severe Disability Group, a short form will be sent to their specialist clinician.  The form is similar to the SR1/DS1500 form used for claimants who are terminally ill.

You can download a copy of the SR1 form from the response to this freedom of information request.

If the specialist confirms that the claimant meets the criteria, they will not be required to attend an assessment and will no longer be required to fill in complex forms, such as the PIP ‘How your disability affects you’ form or the ESA50/UC50.

Testing the criteria

The DWP are currently running two tests of the draft Severe Disability Group criteria

One test involves asking a selected group of clinicians to identify patients they believe are suitable.

The other test involves the DWP contacting claimants they consider to be likely to meet the criteria and asking if they would be willing to take part.  If they are, the DWP will then contact their clinician and ask them to complete a brief form. 

The DWP have said that participation is entirely voluntary, claimants can withdraw at any time and they “will not be financially disadvantaged by taking part.”

Official criteria

In order to meet the Severe Disability Group criteria, the DWP say claimants must :

have an irreversible or progressive condition, confirmed or managed by a secondary care specialist, with no realistic prospect of improvement 

have had no significant response to treatment, or treatment will not improve function, or no further treatment is planned

have a severe impairment of physical or mental function (or likely to develop this within 6 months) such that they need assistance from another person to complete two or more activities of daily living

The Secretary of State is satisfied that, for the individual patient the criteria have been fulfilled for: 
enhanced Personal Independence Payment (PIP) daily living or mobility components
functional limited capacity for work-related activity (LCWRA) or support group

Our interpretation

There is no published official guidance on how to interpret these criteria. So, please be aware that the definitions below are our understanding of the criteria, they are not official definitions.

An irreversible condition is one that may not deteriorate further but will also not improve, such as a learning disability, ADHD, spinal cord injury or cerebral palsy.

A progressive condition is one that is known to deteriorate, such as osteoarthritis, Parkinson’s disease, COPD or Alzheimer’s disease.  

A secondary care specialist is someone who is not in the first line of treatment.  So, a GP or mental health nurse would not be included, but a cardiologist or a psychiatrist would be.  It appears that you don’t need to be currently seeing a specialist, but you need to at least have had your condition confirmed by a specialist.

There is no planned treatment that will improve your condition further.

Your condition needs to affect two or more activities of daily living to the extent that you need assistance from another person.  These activities aren’t defined, but the list of PIP daily living activities would seem to be a likely place to start.

For PIP, you need to be able to meet the threshold for an enhanced award of the PIP daily living or mobility component.  If you don’t already get an award, you can check the criteria using the Benefits and Work PIP test.

For UC or ESA, you need to meet the criteria for being in the LCWRA group or the support group.  If you don’t currently get either of these benefits you can our UC WCA test for LCWRA or use our ESA test for the support group.

Would you qualify?

The DWP say they worked with specialist health professionals to develop the criteria and also consulted with several charities.

But, as always, they don’t seem to have talked to any of the claimants who will be on the receiving end of this system.

So, we’d like to hear your opinions and queries about the criteria in the comments section below. 

And, if you currently get at least one component of PIP at the enhanced rate or you are in the LCWRA group for UC or the support group for ESA, do you think you would meet these criteria and be eligible for the Severe Disability Group?  Or is there something about your condition, your contact with health professionals or something else that you think would threaten your chances?

You can read the full Severe Disability Group test: information for clinicians  Please note: considerably more details about the Severe Disability Group criteria were added to the DWP web page on 27 February.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 months ago
    This news doesn't fill me with any joy or confidence.  It fills me with dread despite receiving PIP and being in support group of ESA.  Every time bar one, when I have applied for PIP I have had to go to tribunal.  It really infuriates me that the assessors disregard, don't believe, assume, misremember and blatantly lie during assessments.  My last assessment was a few years ago during Covid and I recorded it covertly as it was over the phone and I am so glad I did.  When I got my report I was gob smacked and was even doubting my memory which isn't great anyway as to what was said during the assessment.  I have several medical conditions diagnosed including CFS, FM and chronic migraines to name a few.  The assessor had said I had had a migraine took a tablet and was ok. This never happened, she misremembered (lied) about treatments I have  etc.  I could not believe all the lies.  I got it all transcribed and sent it to the courts along with a copy of the actual voice assessment.  As usual I won at tribunal, but those that win at tribunal are always punished because they are not given the same conditions and the PIP ends whilst they are waiting for a decision where as PIP by any other avenues carries on until a decision is made on the new one.  DWP treat FM and CFS as a joke and don't take it seriously, we are left to manage it by ourselves as there is no cure, and no specialists involved.  I don't think this will change anything for the good but will make it worst.  The Drs have enough to do already. God help us all
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 months ago
    According to the guide 'Severe Disability Group test: information for clinicians' I should qualify under the section 'Syndromes characterised by chronic pain and fatigue' as I have M.E.
    I have had this for almost 30 years, so under the SDG Criteria I would be classed as having 'an irreversible or progressive condition'.  BUT: when I read the very short form for clinicians to complete, under 'Q.11 Part 2: Clinical Features' it says 'Clinical features which indicate a severe progressive condition' - there is no mention of an 'irreversible condition'.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 months ago
      @wightrider That short form is an SR1 for those with a up to 12 months left terminal diagnosis, it isn’t the actual form they are going to send to clinicians for the severe disability group test
      It says above “The form is similar to the SR1/DS1500 form used for claimants who are terminally ill.”
      I think Benefits & Work have provided that purely to show how short the new form for the severe disability group is likely to be.


  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 months ago
    I consider the proposed new Severe Disability Group criteria to be of considerable help to claimants.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 months ago
    I am on PIP with enhanced for both Mobility and Care.  Looking at the SDG not sure if I would qualify other than via multiple categories.  Very concerned from the point of view that my GPs surgery do not know the full extent of how my medical problems affect my daily activities.  I have recently been diagnosed with a heart condition and am on a waiting list for further test and procedures with meds only keeping symptoms from causing a heart attack or stroke.  So concerned.  All my other medical  problems for which I receive PIP come from an eventual diagnosis of ME that has left me severely restricted in what I can do on a daily basis. On the plus side for those that 'exactly fit' the DWP's criteria should be spared the terrible stress and physical strain that claiming benefits puts on people.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 months ago
      @Goodlife I agree with you, it's all very disconcerting and worrying. This new set up can only up set us in the long run. Nothing ever easy is it??
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 months ago
    I feel that I would qualify... Laryngectomy, knee cartilage damage, Osteopenia in lower back, the latter under treatment, but a 5 year course, and no guarantee of success...
    Asthma, chronic bronchial, qualify for pip lower awards, but tribunal imminent, and I feel confident that I can win both enhanced categories...
    Will apply for the severe disability group when it becomes generally available!!!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 months ago
    Surely if a sight impaired claimant has a Certificate of Visual Impairment or BD8 Certificate then that should be sufficient to act as a secondary specialist confirmation rather than the SR1 form.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 months ago
    I have OA secondary to JHSD. I receive Standard daily living and enhanced mobility. I have daily pain and fatigue. 
    I self manage and the only secondary care physician I’ve seen is for an essential tremor.
    Therefore I  think I may qualify but don’t have a secondary physician to verify.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 months ago
    Been disabled so long I was originally awarded Severe Disablement Allowance in my twenties until my retirement age. Then along came Employment Support Allowance which abolished my SDA and required me to apply all over again for ESA.

    Thanks (not) to my unusual disability I qualified for ESA straight away and thanks to the criteria have remained so.

    My Disability Living Allowance journey only began two years before it was abolished, as my disability did not fit the criteria until my psychiatrist intervened.

    Within two years, I had to reapply for PIP. Denied, reconsidered, denied appealed - awarded.
    Reviewed, denied, reconsidered, denied, appealed - awarded by a tribunal just by confirming my name. Yet it's been the same disability, throughout.

    Going on my CURRENT PIP award, I would qualify for this new scheme, if it relieved me from the tremendous mental stress experienced - when it comes to reviews, I'd welcome it, for me.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 months ago
    Many neuros drop you like a stone and refuse to see you for many long term conditions. ME/CFs or FND it’s bye bye. There is no one else. Funny because from the start they have refused the whole “we can’t rely on only the medical evidence from medical people who know you best” now it we can for limited conditions that also get ongoing support. I mean I’m glad if some people get an easier time but most of the rest of us will not get better either. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 months ago
    Quite frankly they just didn’t want our input.
    I don’t know if I’d qualify anyway. I have ASD, Fybromyalgia and Osteoarthritis and mental illness. I get the higher rate of care but only lower rate for mobility, they won’t give me the highest rate for mobility because I’ve retired. Which is discrimination. My current award ends in 2026, so I’m not holding my breath.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 months ago
    Think I would qualify.  Currently esa support group, enhanced daily living pip and standard mobility.  I was diagnosed with Aspergers syndrome 10 years ago.  The diagnosis was from a psychologist from the CLASS. Clinic in Cambridge where Simon baron Cohen is based or was at the time.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 months ago
    I currently get PIP and qualify for enhanced in both daily living and mobility.  But I would not qualify for this new scheme as I have never seen even my specified doctor at my surgery since we moved here 7 years ago (only ever a stand-in doctor or a nurse), let alone a specialist.  Yet I have been hospitalised for 3 weeks in this time.  I have several conditions, both mental and physical, none of which will ever improve.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 months ago
    Nope. I qualify fully on every count *except* that the condition needs to be managed by a specialist, and the local NHS doesn't have any. Since I've had it for half a century and there's no treatment or prospect of cure, they'd probably be disinclined to refer me to an out of area specialist just to jump through a DWP hoop. It would, quite rightly, be regarded as a waste of public money and consultant time.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 months ago
    My Daughter had a brain tumour surgically removed at age 3. She was left with partial sight and hemiplegia on the left side.  Now aged 32 and on enhanced PIP for mobility and low rate for living she has scans every two years and the only secondary care specialist she has contact with is a neuro consultant for scan analysis. I don’t know if he counts for this.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 months ago
    I have severe and enduring MH issues, always managed by psychotherapists (NHS) as I am too scared to get diagnosed. I have had 21 yrs of weekly therapy & am going to be discharged soon as my therapist is leaving and not being replaced, also there's not a lot else that can be done for except therapeutic support which the NHS doesn't offer. I will always have significant difficulties with daily living but am unlikely ever to qualify for secondary care again, unless I pursue psychiatric diagnosis which I would literally rather die than do. I wish I could escape the existential hell wheel that the DWP put us all on, but it's increasingly likely that rather than support me to live, it will push me out.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 months ago
      @G Hi G, as you say, after 21 yrs of psychotherapy I know why. I have never needed a diagnosis to access the therapy, which is a great rarity and I've never taken that for granted. Mental health is a very complicated and complex thing, and is different for everyone. Diagnoses are not a comfort for all of us. Unfortunately the dangers of diagnosis are not generally accepted by either the DWP or by most psychological services. I am protecting myself, for very good reason.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 months ago
      @Aw Hello A, 
      You have my sympathy but I wonder why you’re so reluctant to get a diagnosis? It’s usually empowering and a great relief: you can start to get proper treatment be it with medication or not. ( You need to see a psychiatrist to get prescribed meds and psychotherapists aren’t always the answer). 
      As you’ve been suffering for so long and have been seeing so. For  21 years you must have a fairly good insight into what may be wrong? 

      ( I had severe anxiety and suicidal depression as a child which continued to my first breakdown at 19. I then had a severe psychotic episode 
      At 24, 26 and 28. I was hospitalised. 
      I was finally diagnosed after 9 years ( this is a normal amount of time) with Bipolar 1. Since then I’ve had no end of different meds but I feel I have some control over the condition. I would have killer myself years ago if it weren’t for them. I’ve also had a regular psychotherapist.
      I also have Ehlers-Danlos syndrome ( constant joint pain etc) , bronchiectasis and just had open heart surgery. 
      Having always been on incapacity benefit, the DWP awarded me 0 points for everything. But that’s another story… 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 months ago
    Currently have lower rates of PIP for mobility and daily living due to severe arthritis. My condition was diagnosed 7 years ago but I haven't seen a secondary care specialist in over 3 years as they said there was nothing that would help. I now just manage my condition myself and don't have any medical appointments. I am one of the very many people waiting for a PIP reassessment but have had the letter from DWP saying I might be waiting for another year or more yet. When my reassessment was due, I sent in a lot of additional information which I believe should put me into the higher rate for mobility at least and possibly for daily living too. From reading the info about this new Severe Disability Group, I may qualify technically as there is no chance of my condition improving, but I wouldn't have a secondary care specialist to sign any form.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 months ago
    I've been in receipt of ICB then ESA (support group, contributions based then income-related)  since 1998 and on DLA initial standard rate then enhanced since 2003 when I developed a further condition. I've also been late-diagnosed with ADHD and autistic.  More recently, Long Covid inc post covid hypertension, peripheral neuropathy, cognitive impairment, postural tachycardia and fatigue. I use a wheelchair. I haven't seen a neurologist since 2010 because nothing for them to do and find it really hard to even see my GP for monitoring with the new appointment systems. I've started doing some therapeutic work which I'm still waiting to hear back about - nearly 6 months now, and worried they'll move me to a different ESA group or even UC. I don't think I'd be fast-tracked under this scheme - I don't have any up-to-date proof except some medications.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 months ago
    I am concerned about the wording of irreversible condition. I have SLE, am in remission from cancer and suffer pain and debilitating fatigue, I have ankle injury. There is no realistic way to improve these things and despite secondary care over many years they have not improved. I also have kidney disease, and have been left with lense uncorrectable vision issues from surger. but my conditions that cause debilitating fatigue and pain don't sound like they are included as some people benefit from treatment. This is very concerining
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 months ago
    as a blind person my condition will never get better will i quala
    fie
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 months ago
    DWP could potentially in breach of the Equailty Act (sound familiar) if it gives fast track precedence to certain disabilities and not others, that being in the fast track is only for certain disabilities and not others

    Also what is the position if a claimants is already on light touch with enhanced award - would the DWP re-assess those claimants again sounds pretty taxing of they do just to re-state the position the claimant was already in, in the first place 

    Any ideas?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 months ago
      @Nora I 💯 agree
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 months ago
      @M Good point. The people that work on this site will soon shred th8s ridiculous pathway apart very quickly. The quick pathway already exists for some people... also sone people are not assessed because their medical evidence can give them the full awards. So will those who have money and get a private dr to diagnose them/write a report get a greater advantage compared to the poor. Have you noticed they seem to have abandoned the possible means testing on pip. Wja6 about those woth many middle range conditions which can be as debilitating as those woth one or two severe  conditions. How many drs are there goi g to be able to havebthe time to do these "report's". What about those with mental health ? Do you have to commit suic8de to prove your psychiatric/neurodivergent condition is severe? 
      As usual wind bags talking with nonproper crit8cal thinking. 

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.