Disabled campaigners against the bedroom tax have begun a three-day hearing at the Court of Appeal to challenge last year's High Court ruling that the implementation of the government's under-occupancy is lawful.{jcomments on}

Last July, three law firms representing 10 claimants argued that the bedroom tax discriminates against disabled social housing tenants.

Though the High Court accepted that the legislation is discriminatory, it ruled that the discrimination was justified as regards disabled adults and therefore lawful.

Since its beginnings, campaigners and lawyers have argued that the bedroom tax discriminates against disabled people where so-called spare rooms are used to store vital equipment, are used by occasional overnight carers or are used by a tenant's partner when their disability means they find it difficult to share a bedroom.

Read the full story on 24dash.com

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.

Be the first to comment.

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.