- Posts: 51290
IB Tribunal Decision Dismissed
- Johnny
- Topic Author
New to the forums and would like some information if possible?
Suffering from CFS/ME last 10 years.
Suffering From Depression/Anxiety and Panic Attacks since 1994.
Was on IB and DLA (Higher and Lower) and also have a motorbility car.
Had a Atos medical in june 2010 whre I scored 0 PCA and 1 for physical and mental health.
Just had a tribunal June 2011.
Evidence presented from 2 different Phycologists that they confirm I suffer with the mental problems.
Letter from my doctor comfirming my medical conditions.
Recieved a letter about my tribunal decision.
The appeal is dismissed.
The appellant scores 4 point:
16e -1
17a -2
17f -1
Could someone try to give me some info as to what I could do?
Thanks in advance
John
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- originaldave
Hi al,
New to the forums and would like some information if possible?
Suffering from CFS/ME last 10 years.
Suffering From Depression/Anxiety and Panic Attacks since 1994.
Was on IB and DLA (Higher and Lower) and also have a motorbility car.
Had a Atos medical in june 2010 whre I scored 0 PCA and 1 for physical and mental health.
Just had a tribunal June 2011.
Evidence presented from 2 different Phycologists that they confirm I suffer with the mental problems.
Letter from my doctor comfirming my medical conditions.
Recieved a letter about my tribunal decision.
The appeal is dismissed.
The appellant scores 4 point:
16e -1
17a -2
17f -1
Could someone try to give me some info as to what I could do?
Thanks in advance
John
bad news if they have made a mistake in law you can take it to the upper tribunal .. you need expert advise as your options are limited
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Gordon
- Offline
You can appeal the Tribunal Decision, but you would need to show that there had been an error of law in the precedings, which is not easy to do and would require assistance from an advisor with experience in this area.
The first stage of the process, which might be worth doing anyway is to request a Statement of Reasons from Leader of the panel. This will explain in more detai how they came to their conclusion.
On the assumption that you are not fit for work, you can apply for ESA, this would not prejudice any future action you might want to take with regard to your IB.
ESA, whilst similar to IB, does have some important difference in its operation, so you should consider getting face to face advice from the CAB or Welfare Rights.
If you have more questions, come back to the forum.
Gordon
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Johnny
- Topic Author
Thanks for your replies, I had a feeling I would have to go through specialist people, but not got the funds.
I'll try give CAB a ring and get a meeting.
I'm just worried now that they will decide to stop my DLA and lose my car.
Could this happen?
This is so upsetting and I know it's happening to almost everybody.
Thanks to places like this, I know I'm not alone.
Thanks again
John
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- pata1
Just a quick addition to Gordon's good advice, an 'error of law' is defined as :
WHAT IS AN ERROR OF LAW ?
The basic rules are outlined in Commissioners decisions R(A) 1/72 and R(I) 14/75 in turn based on the principles stated in Global Plant Ltd v Sec of State for Social Services (1972) IQB
A decision of a Disability Appeal Tribunal, Social Security Appeal Tribunal, or a Medical Appeal Tribunal may be erroneous in law if :
1) there has been any breach of the rules of natural justice ( loosely meaning 'fair play at work')
or
2) there has been a failure to comply with the requirements to record in writing adequate reasons for the decision and relevant findings.
or
3) it contains a false proposition of the law ex facie ( on the face of it)
or
4) it is supported by no evidence
or
5) the facts found were such that no person acting judicially and properly instructed as to the relevant law could have come to the determination in question.
or
6) Technical error. This sixth ground is NOT covered by the R(A)1/72 etc grounds.
Generally, it could be summaried as a technical or proceedural error, a breach of the statute or of the regulations.
Hope this helps.
Pat
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.