I just wanted to clarify things. I thought I remembered a post from November. It looks like Derek4 disagrees
I think you have misunderstood what I meant
You are perfectly correct that a Tribunal can only look at your condition as it was at the time of the Decision that is appealing, however, for DLA, awards are made for a specific period, so when I said "subsequently" I meant it in the context of the duration of the award, not interms of them considering your health over that period.
I hope this explains it better.
Gordon
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.