× Members

Telephone Assessment Review as Appointee

More
9 months 1 day ago #287929 by Wendy Woo
Replied by Wendy Woo on topic Telephone Assessment Review as Appointee
Thank you Gary, I am my son's appointee (I did mention this in my post), which is why I have been following the members' posts on this thread.

Following some previous advice from you and other Mods to various questions I asked about this previously, I have reached the stage of applying for a Tribunal, but I feel it is completely pointless, especially as my son was awarded PIP at the Standard Care rate for 6 years. However, that is less that he was receiving previously and he would lose his job and struggle with life generally without help from his family, so it is important to me that the full extent of his difficulties is "officially" recognised. I feel that his previous award (Enhanced Care and Standard Mobility), which was awarded after a Mandatory Reconsideration and was the same level as the DLA he had been receiving for 18 years before PIP was introduced, recognised the full extent of his problems, so I have reluctantly applied for an appeal. However, I'm sure he will be able to convince the panel that he has no problems at all, as he resents his diagnosis - autism - and rejects the idea that he cannot manage alone. I know that, one day, when I am no longer here to provide support, this will be put to the test, but I try not to think about it, as it is just too frightening. I believe there is support available to people with a recent diagnosis of autism because much more is known about it now, but this did not exist when my son was diagnosed and we were just left to get on with life as best we could. Clearly, we cannot expect any help from the DWP and, frankly, I don't expect the tribunal to be any more sympathetic. According to statistics I have read in the past, most autistic people's first experience of a courtroom comes when they end up in one being tried for a criminal offence.

Sorry for the rant, especially as I was initially applying to a post detailing a positive experience - it's good to know some people are taken seriously.

Best wishes,
Wendy
The following user(s) said Thank You: Sheila 966

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
9 months 1 day ago #287937 by Chris
Replied by Chris on topic Telephone Assessment Review as Appointee
Hi Wendy Woo,

Your rant is totally understandable given the circumstances. I doubt you'll be the last to experience this sort of thing, and feel the way you do. Another sad case of a sign of the times unfortunately :(

Regards, Chris.

Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
The following user(s) said Thank You: Wendy Woo

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
9 months 1 day ago #287950 by denby
Replied by denby on topic Telephone Assessment Review as Appointee
Well Wendy Woo, someone older that I know got their Autism diagnosis at a celebrated London hospital eleven years ago. [What a place to send someone from a home counties market town for that, just as well they weren't too freaked by travelling on busy Tubes etc!]. They sent them away with a letter and absolutely no follow on advice. Later I discovered that many books published by Jessica Kingsley on Autism had already been published by then, several of which proved very helpful. But the hospital didn't even suggest looking for books.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Wendy Woo

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
9 months 1 day ago #287956 by Wendy Woo
Replied by Wendy Woo on topic Telephone Assessment Review as Appointee
Hello denby,

I was under the impression (hoping!) that things had improved, but clearly not. Thank you for taking an interest - maybe I should do a bit more research. I read a lot about autism when my son was first diagnosed, but lately I've just been muddling through - you get used to just living from day to day, coping with situations as they arise, don't you? But PIP assessors don't understand that.

Best wishes,
Wendy
The following user(s) said Thank You: denby

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
9 months 1 day ago #287957 by BIS
Hi WendyWoo

It's entirely up to you what you do next. You have to do what you can cope with please don't assume that the Tribunal Panel will be unhelpful. Some are bad, but the majority of Tribunals are won by the claimants - not the DWP. When you submit the papers, you can state as your son's appointee, you will be representing him and speaking on his behalf at the Tribunal. You can ask beforehand whether the Tribunal Chair - wants him to be there. In my experience - even if they say yes (and they don't always if you ask in plenty of time), - they will speak to you first and after that conversation - they are unlikely to insist on seeing him. It is then you talk about his autism, the amount of support you have to give, and because of his condition, he will say that he thinks the panel wants to hear and that he will not be able to represent himself adequately. This is a huge strain on you, and you can only do what is right for you and your son.

BIS

Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
The following user(s) said Thank You: Sheila 966, Wendy Woo

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
9 months 1 day ago #287964 by Wendy Woo
Replied by Wendy Woo on topic Telephone Assessment Review as Appointee
Hello BIS,

Thank you so much for your advice. I have begun the appeal as I didn't want to be outside the timeframe, so I'm now waiting on the DWP's response, which I believe is the next stage. When I see what evidence they have, and if there is anything other than the assessor's report to say that my son's condition has improved (although I don't really see how there can be), I will decide whether to continue or withdraw. As you rightly say, I'm finding all this a huge strain, but it's encouraging to hear from other members and receive their support, and the recent statistics published in the newsletter (i.e. only 1% of claimants won their tribunal because of extra evidence) seem to be in our favour!

Thank you all very much.

Wendy
The following user(s) said Thank You: denby, Sheila 966

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: GordonGaryBISCatherineWendyKellygreekqueenpeterKatherineSuper UserChrisDavid
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.