× Members

HCP summary justification : Identical & Repetitive

More
1 year 4 months ago #281999 by RHAN
Hi B&W. :)

I have a simple question Regarding the PA3 v2 report by the HCP.

In their Summary Justification, in absolutely every activity, their reply is 95% identical and repetitive, and in a parrot fashion way, then remainder has minor adjustments to the same phrases just to suit each activity, as if its was just copied and pasted in every activity and finished with the conclusion of their opinion basically saying “therefore likely that they are able”.

Is this normal for the report to be so identical & repetitive in all activities, or should there be more to it?

Thanks in advance. :)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
1 year 4 months ago #282042 by Gordon
RG

I can't say that it is unusual to see this.

Have you checked the Descriptors recommended and whether they would lead to an acceptable award?

Gordon

Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
1 year 4 months ago #282049 by RHAN
Hi gordon

The PA3 v2 is all “A”, so all zeros, and The DM letter all zeros.
The DM just sided with the HCP.
DM just listed all actives in order, like a parrot, then said “I decided”, then copied and pasted the same wording that the HCP used, and that was it, no real worth in it.

HCP left out basically every hard evidence along with the conditions., so hardly anything included in the “evidence used in formulating advice” section and used an old prescription to justify it and even decided to lower the dose of it.
Everything sent in Special Delivery so I know they had it all, I just cant believe it.

I just wanted to know if its common for HCP just to answer each activity the same as if its copies and pasted.

:)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
1 year 4 months ago #282057 by denby
Our daughter had a PA4 just like that a few years ago. Not to mention the outright lies that our recording disproved, eg 'coped well with the assessment did not appear distressed' when you could hear her sobbing repeatedly and sniffling a lot.
The following user(s) said Thank You: RHAN

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
1 year 4 months ago #282063 by BIS
Hi RobinGoch

Yes, it is common for them to cut and paste and repetitively use the same argument. The Decision Maker is not medically trained, so they rarely go against the Health Professional's judgement. It's also quite common for them not to list the evidence that has been submitted. It's hard then to know whether they looked at it and ignored it, or they never read it at all.


BIS

Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
The following user(s) said Thank You: denby, RHAN

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
1 year 3 months ago #282091 by RHAN
Hi Bis

Thanks for clarifying that.

:)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: GordonGaryBISCatherineWendyKellygreekqueenpeterKatherineSuper UserChrisDavid
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.