Follow our updates on the Spring budget and Health and Disability White Paper here when they are published on Wednesday 15 March and share your own views and insights.


WCA abolition and  new UC health element FAQs

We've published some UC health element FAQs here.  The most important takeaway at the moment is that it's likely to be - at the very least - 6 years before existing UC/ESA claimants are affected. 


 

When will changes happen?

They will be rolled out geographically for new claims first from 2026/27 to 2029.  Only then would existing claimants begin to be affected.  There will be some transitional protection for claimants who have LCWRA but do not get any element of PIP.

"The degree of change in our proposals will require primary legislation, which we would aim to take forward in a new Parliament when parliamentary time allows. These reforms would then be rolled out, to new claims only, on a staged, geographical basis from no earlier than 2026/27. We would expect the new claims roll-out to be completed within three years (so by 2029 at the earliest), when we would then begin to move the existing caseload on to the new system."


 

Full White Paper

The full white paper is here.  It may take a while to digest


New UC Health Element

The UC LCWRA element will be replaced with a new UC health element for claimants getting UC standard allowance and any PIP element.  Paid at same rate as LCWRA element.

"Landmark reforms to the benefits system will change the emphasis from what people can’t do, to what they can, by legislating to remove the Work Capability Assessment (WCA) so that in future there is only one health and disability assessment – the Personal Independent Payment (PIP) assessment.

"This will mean there will be no need to be found to have limited capability for work and limited capability to prepare for work to get additional income-related support for a disability or health condition – reducing the worry claimants currently experience that they will lose their benefits following a reassessment.

"We will replace the current Universal Credit Limited Capability for Work and Work Related Activity (LCWRA) financial top up with a new UC health element. This will be awarded to people who are receiving the UC standard allowance and any PIP element. The award rate of the new UC health element will be set equal to the current award to those people that have LCWRA, ensuring there is a safety net in place for the most vulnerable."


White paper published

The Health and Disability white paper is now online

Correction, it's not the whole white paper yet, just a factsheet giving the major changes.


 

Sanctions

"The next set of employment reforms affects those on universal credit without a health condition who are looking for work or on low earnings. There are more than 2 million jobseekers in this group, more than enough to fill every vacancy in the economy.  Independence is always better than dependence, which is why a Conservative government believes those who can work should.  So sanctions will be applied more rigorously to those who fail to meet strict work search requirements or choose not to take up a reasonable job offer.  And for those working low hours, we will increase the administrative earnings threshold from the equivalent of 15 hours to 18 hours at national living wage for an individual claimant.  Meaning that anyone working below this level will receive more work coach support alongside a more intensive conditionality regime."


Universal Support

"Today I’m going further than that by announcing that in England and Wales after listening to representations from the Centre for Social Justice and others we will fund a new programme called Universal Support.  This is a new voluntary employment scheme for disabled people where the government will spend up to £4,000 per person to help them find appropriate jobs and put in place the support they need. It will fund 50,000 places every single year."


 What the chancellor said

"I start with over 2 million people who are inactive due to a disability or long-term sickness  . . . we could fill half the vacancies in the economy with people who say they would like to work despite being inactive due to sickness or disability.

With Zoom , Teams and new working models that make it easier to work from home, this is possible now more than ever.  So for that reason the ever diligent work and pensions secretary today takes the next step in his groundbreaking work i9n tackling economic inactivity.  I thank him for that and today we publish a white paper on disability benefits reform.  It is the biggest change to our welfare system i9n a decade.

His plans will abolish the work capability assessment in Great Britain and separate benefit entitlement from an individual’s ability to work.  As a result, disabled benefit claimants will always be able to seek work without fear of losing financial support." 


WCA to be abolished

The chancellor has confirmed that the WCA will be abolished


 

Prepayment meters

Prepayment energy meter customers will have charges in line with direct debit customers in the future, rather than having to pay a premium.


Energy Price Guarantee

The Treasury has confirmed that the Energy Price Guarantee will be kept at £2,500 for an additional three months, from April to June. The government claims this will save the average household £160. It's a small improvement, but many are arguing it doesn't go nearly far enough in supporting people on low incomes with their energy bills.


What we're expecting

From the information that has been put out by the Treasury so far, the main issues that we will be looking out for are:

The abolition of the work capability assessment (WCA).

An increase in the severity of the sanctions regime.

Sanctions being issued automatically by DWP software.

The potential abolition of the WCA raises a huge number of questions about how it will be decided whether claimants with health conditions will be subject to the sanctions regime and whether and how they will be assessed for any additional payment because of their health condition or disability.  We hope the white paper will have some of the answers.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 years ago
    This government is to blame. Snatching money from the sick and disabled. Just because the government handed out so much cash in Covid lockdown. So now they want to get the cash they handed out back. Why do they want the sick and disabled to suffer when it wasn’t the sick or disabled who got the cash it was companies and scammers who scammed the government out of millions. The government should have done checks instead of handing out cash to anyone. The government gave anyone 50k cash and lots of people applied for the 50k so many times using fake company names. That’s who the government should sort out not the sick and disabled. This government wants to just pick on sick and disabled people. Utter discusting. The government who have so much cash don’t know how it feels like to be sick and disabled. This government has gone mad well it was mad before when it handed out so much cash to anyone. They never gave it to the sick or disabled. 
    Millions of pounds was handed to anyone so why should the sick and disabled suffer now because of the government’s mistakes. The government should start by punishing themselves all of them should. They should stop bullying the sick with new tactics to get money back.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 years ago
    Hi, I was worried about the proposed changes made to the benefit system as I also claim contribution based ESA and in the support group. If you read Chapter 4 of the White Paper regarding the proposed Changes to the benefit System. No 150 which states "150. Our income replacement benefit proposals will apply to UC. It is not possible to submit a new claim for income-related ESA.[footnote 21] We remain committed to retaining a health and sickness contributory benefit in the future system." So that means that they will leave New Style Esa as a benefit for now in their future proposals.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @Tom Well found, thank you Tom. It looks like there will be protection for contributory folk. I retire in 2032 so hope this will tide me through should I not get well enough to go back to work.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 years ago
    Does this mean that anyone moved on to PIP from DLA will no longer be called in for a Review? Just before Christmas 2022 I had to complete a full PIP Review and I posted it back to them. Any ideas please?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @Martin You will probably have to have a face to face assessment, or if you are lucky a telephone assessment. Which ever you get, be absolutely sure to have an audio recording of it that you make yourself, they may try to put a barrier in your way to stop you from doing it, but stick to your guns, it is your right and is protection for you and your assessor. 
      When my wife was forced to move from DLA to PIP when she was given a home assessment all seemed fine. But the assessor then wrote a report that was a total fabrication of the questions asked and the answers given. We complained to ATOS and they just brushed it aside, as we were in a battle with the DWP we didn't have enough left in us to take the complaint to ICE. We made a second application whilst waiting for a tribunal hearing. DWP had another assessment done which I recorded then kept referring back to the first assessment to try to avoid making an award, but eventually after 2 court appearances she was given a 10 year award with a recommended light touch renewal. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 years ago
    If the PIP assessment and being entitled to PIP is the only way the additional payment can be given for ESA is ridiculous. The PIP system is not functioning at the moment. Subjecting every ESA claimant who is ill to this procedure will throw the PIP system further into turmoil. Waiting 6 months plus for a reconsideration. 12 months plus to get to appeal. Is ludicrous! The PIP system is so flawed it needs abolishing..

    On another topic. Recordings of PIP assessments. Make sure you take your phone to record the assessment yourself  I was assured 3 times that the DWP would record but on the day the assessor said that recording facilities weren't available at the centre. A blatant lie. I compared the report to the recording and the assessor missed out pertinent information. Without my recording I wouldn't have been able to challenge the information provided to the case manager.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 years ago
    Thought about this some more, they are effectively removing IR ESA altogether (Current form is LCWRA and LCW on UC), selling it as removing WCA to make it sound like they doing everyone a favour, replaced it with a health topup which is akin to a disability premium, I assume to get charities and PIP claimants onside.  But there will be nothing for people who are too ill to work but dont qualify for PIP.  when you realise thats whats absolutely happening its truly terrifying, they figured out a way to basically remove sickness benefits in this country.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @chrysalis Exactly my situation. I get LCWRA but not PIP how the hell can I live of UC alone but still too poorly to hold down a job? 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 years ago
    I am sure I read something recently on B&W that said most people are now put into the ESA SG/LCWRA, and that this is most often done on the strength of the 'exceptional circumstance' rule, where 15 points (usually needed to be gained via the Descriptors), is given on the basis of the 'risk' a person presents, to themselves or others.

    So, by removing the WCA, this avenue is also removed perhaps.

    Maybe they will rework the PIP form, hopefully taking some tips from the Scots? xx
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 years ago
    Thinking about this, will the 9 month sickness rule apply before you can even claim anything for the UC health .This will have a huge impact on the newly diagnosed very sick people.Saying people can work from home is also ridiculous if you are living with chronic illness,on opioid painkillers and hospital appointments.Try living a day in the life of someone in severe pain 24/7 Mr Hunt,you have no idea.I was caught up in the last debacle of benefit reform from George Osborne and his sneering strivers versus shirkers.Somehow found the strength to fight for 10 years of assessments with Rheumatoid arthritis.Now over 60 and nearly crippled by it ,they gave me ongoing pip for 10 years.Feel very sad for everyone stressed by this .This site is amazing and will give the best advice I’m sure.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 years ago
    I do not know how the Tory government can sleep at night. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @Fi It’s because people of 60 plus will be of pension age in 2029, therefore not affected.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @Danny I expect they sleep very well indeed protected by their masive wages and wealth usually inherited at birth in a very nice home or homes.
      They also benefit from a class system that ensures that those with money get the best education and best careers in professions like law,banking,media and business.
      They also get the highest levels of police protection so what have they to lose sleep over. Though they probably lose sleep when they hear that poor or sick people can get small amounts of benefit money so they can scrape by. Daresay that they get enraged by that.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @Cal What does being age 60 have to do with these changes? Thanks 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @Cal I am on ten year pip review with a supposedly light touch review in 2029 - what happens then? I also on income related esa support group.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @ClaireLO If you receive pip you will be safe otherwise your in big  trouble if your under60
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 years ago
    This really worries me so much. I know how ill Iam and if there is anything I could do to get into work, of course I would. I envy workers and long for my life back prior to developing my illness. I struggle to get through the day now let alone do anything top of this. That said if it’s decided that I don’t get PIP I will somehow have to start doing work prep and find a job (fine if you are trying to send my to a very early grave).not to mention that it would be impossible to live on a tiny amount (if you cannot work) when your sick. I just can’t see it working.I am all for helping people back into work who genuinely can do work, I have no problem with that at all. My biggest concern is that many people who are unfit to work will be forced to do will be living off such a small amount of money that they will be destitute.

    The only thing I am wondering is if the criteria for the new PIP assessment will be changed and perhaps less strict. At present they always state that the PIP criteria is nothing todo with if you can work or not so I assuming it will be changed and hopefully less strict or done in another way that looks at work tasks etc. It’s a major concern for so many sick and disabled people but hopefully it’ll never be passed. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @Danny They can change the name of things but still don’t mean I can work. So it looks like I be on the streets, the way this gov are making me feel I don’t care no way will I work as I am too Ill. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 years ago
    Will there still be a contribution based support group or equivalent or is everything means tested?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @Dorothy @Dorothy Yes I noticed his well spotted info on cb esa, hopefully we will scrape through, as I like you get a pension in 2032 and then if not slightly before as I maybe able to take it a couple of years earlier, I will be out of this system, for good.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @Lizzie Tom seems to have given a reassuring answer above wrt Chapter 4 section 150. Hopefully this will be elaborated in the future but they are still maintaining a contributory sickness benefit in the future.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @Dorothy Yes I was wondering that it seems that a PIP is the passport to the new system but it all seems to talk about universal credit, but I am contribution based esa and not eligible for any means tested benefits so what happens to people like me, this all seems to hang on universal credit.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 years ago
    I'm currently on ESA in the Support Group, but it's slightly comforting to know that I probably won't be affected until 2029 at the very earliest, if I've read it correctly. And that's if it even goes ahead - a lot of people believe Labour will be in by then, but personally I don't hold out much hope because no matter what happens the Tories always seem to get voted back in. I'm working on improving my health so hopefully I won't even be on ESA anymore when the changes come in, but you never know what will happen. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @BobDole so true
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @MrFibro Labour will be worse, trust me they're talking about giving families a wage to live off weekly, under what they think will be suitable, each family will be assessed, so you will be worse off if they get in, any way it will take around 6 years to get this in order, people on high end of pip wont be effected, nor will your esa if your on lcwra it will just come under a different name or eventually coupled up with pip, but to me it looks like they will target the ones on lcw, to get back into work first, less disability, and so they should to many people playing ill, when geniune people need it, its not the goverment taking it from the real disability folk, its the ones that can not be trully arsed to pay for things and have become to lazy to work.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @MrFibro MrFibro The way I interpreted most of that announcement was Jeremy Hunt and the Tories trying to pander to their supposedly waning voter base by acting tough on benefits claimants.

      Another problem is that people simply just don't care; they pretend that our most vulnerable aren't being treated like absolute dirt by clinging to the belief that benefits claimants are lazy scoungers etc, and refuse to believe otherwise.

      Sadly one of the reasons I don't have much hope for Labour getting in is because from what I've read they probably won't be much different; they have a very anti-benefits shadow work and pensions secretary.

      So either way, benefits claimants, in particular vulnerable claimants with serious health conditions, will be fudged.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @BobDole Hi bobdole,

      The reason the nasty party keeps getting back in is coz they know how to dangle the right carrots!  And Labour haven't grasped on how to do that for over 12 years.

      I'm no tory, but labour wont be any different with claimants at all if they win the next GE.  I find labour's too weak of a party.  And the tories seem to be very savy when it comes to business.

      2029 well by then i'd had already been retired since 2025.  Not unless the tories put the working age up further.  I feel for the younger generation, who are ill, sick, and disabled who will have to live a working life (16 - 68 maybe up to 72) jumping through endless hoops in order to claim benefits to stay alive.

      But there's no shadow of doubt, things wont be getting easier with the benefits system, it will only get worse.  


  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 years ago
    I am on Employment Support in the Support Group due to   Disability, I am a contribution based claimant, as I worked before being diagnosed with my disease. How will the changes affect me.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 years ago
    How can you force some disable people to work. I have been caring for my wife who has cancer since 2022, she cannot get out of house without a lot help and assistance, she has loads of hospital appointments for Chemo and other test sometime upto 5 times a week. We already on highest level pip and it is silly to think she could go out to work as would not been a job for her to do with her current lack of mobility and health conditions. This clearly not right way forward and goverment is bullying and picking on sick and Disable people again
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @Concerned_Carer Concerned carer, I absolutely agree that no one in our situations should have this hanging over us, absolutely not. My partner is in a similar situation to yours and I am currently his full time carer. He won't reach pension age for another 7 years and I do fear what will happen later on. So I am totally with you on that. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @Concerned_ Career I understood that this was on a voluntary basis, they cannot force disabled people to work. Being in receipt of pip does allow you to  do some work if you are able  to according to how your disability affects you.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @Concerned_ Career Hi Concerned_ Career,

      The muppets in the nasty party, have suggested that 2 million jobs can be filled in the UK, and indicating that ill, sick, disabled people / claimants can work, ie at home doing a telephone job !!!!  what an effin larf lol.

      Those heartless muppets are clueless, and the majority of them have all led a life of being pampered by a golden spoon.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @ClaireLO That not point, reguardless disable people should not forced to work, if they are not able to work because of health reason and goverment should understand that some are just too ill or sick to work and need support for long term disaility and assistance. My wife could dead befoe these changes come in to place but it unfair to those who follow. What ever happen to caring govement !
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @Concerned_ Career Hi there, these changes should not affect your wife for some years yet, the summaries published on here are very good at clarifying the changes. They very much helped me understand what is happening going forward. Best wishes to you both 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 years ago
    "Don't worry yet" is easily said I know, but under these projections Starmer's Labour will have most likely been in (and then possibly out of again) office by 2029. So between now and then absolutely anything could (and probably will) happen, whether or not Starmer intends to actually change this policy or merely water it down and superficially 'make it nice' (sadly on his current record of shamelessly courting the 'nice tory' vote I'd say it'll be the latter, but who knows).

    Fortunately, tory ideological malice is equally matched by tory incompetence and given that every farcical new tory welfare policy usually takes at least 2-4 years longer than originally projected to actually come to pass (see ESA to UC migration for just one example), it seems unlikely that any of this will actually happen for existing IRESA and PIP claimants before 2030. By then I imagine tory stategists believe they might be back in office with a perceived 'full mandate from the people'.

    You could therefore view this as a rare example of long-term political thinking, most likely kicking the issue into the long grass until they think they can bring it in safely unopposed in seven or eight years' time.

    I myself am due a PIP review in May next year. I intend to save worrying about this policy until then when I can consolidate it with that worry and worry more efficiently. :)
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @wibblum You are spot on. 

      So many unknowns but this is years away. 

      Regarding the election after next, if the right really get hold of the tories, with the guy who thinks you can cook a meal for 30p in charge, might be a £5 Asda voucher a week and that’s your lot!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @wibblum Totally agree with this- and I am focussing my worry and preparation for my partner's March 24 PIP review for now
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 years ago
    Brexit has cost the economy £375 BILLION plus half a million EU works and now they want to force people with significant disabilities and health conditions to do these low paid jobs instead. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @Aw The labour party were asking the government to make changes to the pension allowance for Doctors, and now when its done they scream and shout how unfair it all is, how could any government, say well he/she is a doctor we will tax them less - what about nurses Judge's charity CEO's or a myriad other professions the tax system would be completely unworkable and we should all remember it's the taxpayers of today who pay our benefits, I am on PIP two cancers & COPD among other ailments this is the first benefits I have had since I started work at 14, and all the tax I have paid over the years will not cover my benefits if I stay on them for another 4/5 years, I for one a grateful for the benefit system and all the taxpayers of today, all of us should worry about the labour party who have not had one original idea of how to solve the county's problems they cannot just throw money at everything it just does not work and eventually they will run out of money (as they did under brown) what then for the benefits system      
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @BC 100% agree. As always they expect the most vulnerable to pay. As the Guardian pointed out, this budget has given away £3.8billion in pension savings to only 115,000 already very rich people. Yet it's somehow our fault that they can't afford to pay nurses.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 years ago
    @danbloom1


    Useful info in this Treasury briefing paper on how scrapping the Work Capability Assessment will work in practice

    Essentially you’d just get a PIP assessment and that would either qualify - or deny - you for both PIP, and a health payment within Universal Credit


    How will the new Universal Credit health element work?

    •The new UC health element will be awarded to people who are receiving the UC standard allowance and any PIP element. In effect PIP will therefore act as a passporting benefit for this new UC health element.

    •We will set the award rate of the new UC health element at the same level as is currently awarded to those people determined to have Limited Capability for Work and Work Related Activity (LCWRA).

    •This will abolish the need to be found to have limited capability for work to access additional means-tested support and remove this barrier to work. We will therefore get rid of the categories "limited capability for work and work related activity" and "limited capability for work".

    •Any LCWRA recipients that move to the new system who do not receive PIP will receive transitional cash protection so no one experiences financial loss at the point at which the reform is enacted.

    When will the changes to the benefit system come into effect?

    • We will take time to carefully consider how best to implement these changes and give security and certainty to claimants.

    *Our proposals to transform the benefits system by removing the Work Capability
    Assessment and introducing a new Universal Credit health element will require primary legislation, which we will aim to take early in a new Parliament, when Parliamentary time allows (2024/25)

    🔴Also…

    Scrapping the Work Capability Assessment is NOT a short-term endeavour.

    — No legislation this parliament
    — It will only *start* being scrapped for new claims "no earlier" than 2026/27
    — That takes til 2029 "at the earliest"
    — *After* that, work begins to move existing caseload



    Transitional protection
    156. The degree of change in our proposals will require primary legislation, which we would aim to take forward in a new Parliament when parliamentary time allows. These reforms would then be rolled out, to new claims only, on a staged, geographical basis from no earlier than 2026/2027. We would expect the new claims roll-out to be completed within three years (so by 2029 at the earliest), when we would then begin to move the existing caseload on to the new system.

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @Fury The information quoted in that post only talks about the Work Related Activity (LCWRA) group, not the Support (LCW) group. 

      There is no mention of the Support group at all in the piece above, which suggests that whoever compiled the report is either so ill-informed that they don't know the Support group even exists, or is simply ignoring its existence in the hope that no-one will notice they intend to 'transform' it out of existence.

      As it's the tories, either possibility wouldn't surprise me in the least.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @Elle What does it mean by "new parliament"?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @Dawn See the post above yours for more information 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @wibblum Yes I’ve been trying to find information on how the changes will affect those on esa support group, but I haven’t found anything that refers to it in the white paper briefing! Has anyone seen any reference to it anywhere?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @Elle I think the important detail (or rather lack of it) there is that it appears to suggest that there will no equivalent of the ESA Support Group in this 'Great Plan'. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 years ago
    I have many health issues and I am not well enough to work. I receive universal credit and LCW. Are the government going to remove all my benefits? I am very worried, as my hands are tied. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 years ago
    The government don’t know what they are doing bullying the disabled.
    This is the government who gave millions of pounds in Covid to companies who didn’t exist. Millions of pounds was stolen. The bbc news did a story on this. Thousands of pounds was stolen but did the government do anything to find out where the money went! No nothing at all 
    They just pick on and bully the sick and disabled.
    It’s awful
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @Sarah Sarah,  it was over 6 billion quid, which was  claimed falsely during the pandemic.  I did read somewhere that the government just simply wrote this off.  As it would be too complex to go after them and those, who committed the fraud.

      But if you owed them a knicker, they be straight out to collar you no danger.

      And yes your right, it's the nasty party will claw back as much as they can from the ill, sick, disabled.

      Regards

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 years ago
    This seems to be people on UC and PIP .  But not people if there getting UC and  DLA  
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 years ago
    I am confused more than ever I think I am due another health assessment this sept for UC work related activity but my pip runs until next year so what will happen please.

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact