Figures released by the DWP have revealed that it is the department, rather than assessment providers who are largely to blame for the huge delays in PIP review decisions. They also show that claimants who ask for a review due to a change of circumstances get a much quicker decision.

Last week, disability minister Stephen Timms answered a written parliamentary question on the average wait for a PIP review decision.

He told MPs that, as of September 2024, the median wait for a review initiated by the DWP is :

  • 290 days where it is referred to an assessment provider; and
  • 252 days where it is not referred to an assessment provider.

This suggest that over 8 months of the waiting time is down to the DWP, with assessment providers adding just over a month to the process.

The waiting time for a change of circumstances review requested by a claimant is very much shorter, however, at 69 days.

Timms did offer the reassurance that “Whilst reviews are outstanding, all payments to existing claimants continue. Should a review identify eligibility for an increased award, backdated payments will be made where appropriate to ensure claimants are not adversely impacted by delays.”

Back in September, Timms told MPs that the DWP were recruiting additional case manager to work on PIP.

He also said that the new suppliers of health assessments would be recruiting new health professionals “to ensure they have sufficient capacity to deliver the required volume of assessments”.

However, it now appears that additional health professionals will have little effect on waiting times unless the DWP gets its own house in order.

It is clear that the DWP will be working on some major projects over the coming year. 

There is the flood of managed migrations from ESA to UC which won’t end before December 2025.  And there is the likely change to the work capability assessment due to be announced soon.  Plus there are wholesale changes to the role of jobcentres, which will be unveiled in a forthcoming white paper.

And that’s without taking into account the changes to disability benefits that may be announced in the Spring

In May 2024, there were 392,000 outstanding PIP award reviews.  That is a massive backlog. 

With all their other projects, it seems unlikely that urgently tackling the delays in planned PIP reviews will be much of a priority, in spite of the difficulties and uncertainty that it causes to hundreds of thousands of claimants.

You can read the full parliamentary answer here.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 hours ago
    I sent my review form back in July 24,got a text to say they received it. Heard nothing so rang up was told there is a 53 week wait and if it's longer you will get a extension for 1 year untill a decision is made.The reason for delay was because they are dealing with new claims as priority.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 hours ago
    Makes me wonder what was the point in making me do a PIP review form back in June this year? If they knew these delays had gotten so bad in recent years! Common sense would be to just extend everyone's claims by a couple years and just reset the whole thing, they'll never catch up at this rate! Only had one text from them acknowledging they have the form and that's it and that took till September! Good start given my claim was supposed to run out in January 2025. Hoping to get an automatic extension soon. But how do you know when the DWP does this?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @asmith25 My sympathies, I sent my review form in back in February this year (295 days ago), and just had an extension for another year, (they don't send this out until a month before your existing award runs out, they confirmed this on the phone to me) but it doesn't help with everything else that relies on your proof of award of PIP. My blue badge and free bus/train pass was due to run out at the same time, which I assume is the same for many people, so I am now without both for many weeks because they don't send those letters out soon enough. The Blue Badge can take up to 3 months to go through and the buss pass 6 weeks. I am very stressed over the whole thing, and am worried the same thing could happen again in year, although they say the year is not set in stone, and your existing review could be decided before that, again more uncertainty. I also cannot go anywhere without my Blue Badge, again I am sure it's the same for many, and would have to pay for an indefinite period to get on buses too. More out of our pockets, and we live close to the breadline as it is, and for our sanity, well??? I know they are still requesting reviews for more people, even though they have several more months before their existing award runs out. My friend has recently been sent a review form, despite her award not running out until July 2025. This is crazy when they still have nearly 400,000 people awaiting decisions on existing reviews. DWP, sort yourselves out!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 hours ago
    I sent my PIP review to DWP in January 2024, I recently received correspondence from the DWP to say they still have my PIP form and I they have forwarded the timescale until November 2025.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @Brightstar Very similar to my position. February for me and recent communication in October suggested that they may not be finished in another twelve months!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 hours ago
    It’s 13 months now since I sent my PIP assessment forms in. Took 6 weeks to acknowledge I had sent them. I sent more information from consultants in September. Never acknowledged. 2 weeks ago I was sent a text saying who was going to be looking at the paperwork. Diabolical! 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 39 minutes ago
      @Jillian
      You should get a letter this month sometime, (usually sent out exactly a month before, but can take time to arrive) to extend for another year, but they can still send a decision before the 12 months is up, just to be aware. As for your car, because you will continue to get the same award, they cannot take your car off you, until the extra year is up, or until you receive a final decision, which is hopefully at least the same award. I hope this helps?

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 hours ago
    I submitted my review in July, it runs out in Dec and I haven’t heard anything. Not even an acknowledgment from them. 
    How does this affect my car? Does the award still continue until they decide or will the car stop when the official end date is reached? I presume they still continue to pay the existing award but slightly concerned that the car will stop. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @Deej they should send you a letter saying that the PIP award will be extended until dec 2025.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 hours ago
    This is not a surprise to me:

    My PIP was last reviewed in 2021/2022. 

    I received my review form in September 2021.

    I returned it in November 2021.

    The DWP passed it to 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 hours ago
    My light touch review form, including plenty of evidence that my condition had worsened since the last review, was received by the DWP on 13th October 2023. I had a telephone assessment on 14th November 2024. Now waiting for the outcome. Been told eight weeks which takes us to mid-January 2025.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @Julie Watkins Hi Julie,
      Can I ask was your light touch review a ten year award? I'm asking because I was wondering how deep into the ten years do the DWP apply their 'light touch' review?

      Rgds

      Andy

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 hours ago
    My PIP review took 332 days, but I waited longer than that. Sent form in on May 15th 2023, got text on May 24th 2023 to say they'd received my form, when my award letter finally arrived at the end of April it was dated April 19th 2024. All in all, I waited roughly 350 days before finally getting the new award notice telling me that my award was the same level (advanced Daily Living, standard Mobility).
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 hours ago
    How does this affect PIP tribunals? I applied to PIP July 2023 and still haven’t even had a date provided.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 hours ago
      @Paddy They've stopped my pip even though nothing has changed on my physical conditions, and I've been diagnosed with autism, I added Autism to them, and they've stopped everything. I've now got no money, said they will review 2 ago ago, it's now been delayed till end of January, it's ruined my Christmas, I can't even afford private osteopaths now in the meantime time. I also used money for heating. Now I have to suffer. It's currently at Mandatory Reconsideration stage. Im stressed.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 hours ago
      @Paddy The tribunal (HM Courts and Tribunals Service ( HMCTS ) is only if your application failed and you have gone through the mandatory reconsideration process (the DWP look at their decision again).
      You should have received a text or possibly a letter stating that the DWP are in receipt of your application.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 hours ago
    I waited a full 16 months for my review! It did go to an 'assessment provider' though there was a very satisfying result in the end. My lower rate living component was increased to the maximum thus giving me full PIP. 
    To be clear, I was paid every four weeks as normal while all this was going on though as you can imagine, the not knowing and waiting was stressful (to say the least).
    What was also bizarre is that I only found out my review was finally complete (16 months later) by a healthy back-dated deposit in my nominated bank account. A few days later I received the review award result by post. Given my age I am now the subject of a 10 year 'light touch' review (always supposing that the DWP doesn't move the goalposts).
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 15 hours ago
    Projects for projects sake.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 hours ago
    I often wonder just how much has all the DWP reforms actually cost the taxpayer ? I know that the IT systems ended up being around 12.8 billon (source https://www.computerweekly.com/news/2240185166/Universal-Credit-will-cost-taxpayers-128bn), however I do not know what the other administrative overheads actually cost over the past decade and a half beginning from 2010. 
    It seems the actual costs of implementing the changes themselves have been horrific and the we are still spending money on "fine tuning" this system which it appears to be causing some real hidden costs and shambles.
    Has anyone looked at what the Tories have spent during the past 14 years and how much do Labour intend to spend because it appears the costs seem to far outweigh the benefits the changes will bring. Perhaps someone knows or it has been audited 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 hours ago
      @CaroA According to my rough estimates taking the IT system, The cost to the so called assessors, charities, local authorities that it must be around 20bn pounds plus. If this is the case it does not look like the taxpayer got much value for money as the savings as opposed to the costs seem very negligible given the cost to society, people's lives, and upheavals it has caused. It also begs the question as to who have benefited from this process, the IT companies ? The assessment companies, or the government and so called tax payers. It seems to me that this has been a white elephant project that has served business interests then the people themselves
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 hours ago
      @AJ I think this is a very good observation I wonder how much it has all cost let alone the cost of human suffering... 

      'The question raised is valid, as the financial cost of welfare reforms under successive governments, particularly the DWP’s reforms, is a complex and contentious issue. While there isn't a single, comprehensive figure available for the total cost of implementing these changes since 2010, some key data points and considerations can help piece together an understanding of the broader costs and implications:

      1. Universal Credit IT System Costs:
      The figure of £12.8 billion cited for the Universal Credit IT system highlights the significant financial outlay just to get this cornerstone of the reforms operational. However, this figure does not include ongoing costs for maintenance, updates, or "fine-tuning," which are likely substantial.

      2. Assessment Costs:
      The cost of Work Capability Assessments (WCA) and Personal Independence Payment (PIP) assessments has also been significant. Contracts with private companies like Atos, Capita, and Maximus have run into billions over the years. For instance, the National Audit Office (NAO) reported in 2020 that the DWP spent £1.6 billion on health and disability assessments over three years.

      3. Administrative Overheads:
      The administrative burden of transitioning millions of claimants to new systems, running appeals and tribunals (many of which overturn DWP decisions), and managing public backlash has been immense. NAO reports indicate that handling appeals alone costs the DWP tens of millions annually, with some estimates suggesting that appeals cost taxpayers £100 million a year.

      4. Hidden Costs and Wider Impacts:

      Impact on Public Services: Local councils, charities, and the NHS have faced increased pressure due to claimants needing additional support when benefits are reduced or delayed. For example, food banks have reported dramatic increases in demand correlated with changes to Universal Credit.

      Economic Productivity: By focusing heavily on cutting costs rather than enabling claimants to return to work sustainably, the system may have caused unintended economic harm. For example, the stress and financial instability imposed on claimants can reduce their ability to re-enter the workforce or maintain health.

      5. Audits and Oversight:
      The NAO has produced several critical reports over the years, pointing to inefficiencies, delays, and overspending in the implementation of Universal Credit and other welfare reforms. However, a comprehensive audit compiling all costs from 2010 to present doesn't seem to exist in the public domain.

      6. Future Spending Plans:
      Labour’s plans for the welfare system are less clear-cut but seem to focus on improving fairness and efficiency rather than significant overhauls. However, any policy changes would still require administrative funding and could bring their own implementation costs.

      Conclusion:

      While hard numbers are scarce, available evidence suggests that the costs of DWP reforms have been enormous and are ongoing. Moreover, the "hidden costs" borne by local councils, charities, and individuals experiencing hardship add another layer of complexity that is harder to quantify. If an audit of the full financial impact of these reforms exists, it would likely be conducted by an independent body like the NAO or a think tank, but no such comprehensive analysis has yet emerged'
      .......

      I'm not sure how accurate this is from chat gbt but you would think the National Audit Office would or should have done this sort of longer term analysis.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    It's totally chaos I can't see DWP getting all ESA claimants on UC before end of next year with all the backlog of people waiting to be assessed. They need to sort one problem out at a time or it will be a total disaster.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 hours ago
      @BOB I don't think there's such a chaos, as the migration from ESA to UC is mainly the job of the claimants, to move themselves to UC, and is not carried out by the DWP. And the assessments are carried out by newly restructured four profit-driven private sector companies, which are paid in relation to the number of claimants they've assessed, and thus it's in their own interest to speed up the process and increase the number of claimants they assess.

      In addition, we're in a digital era in which highly performant modern database servers (computers) run database management system software, facilitating and ensuring tasks such as data storage, retrieval, manipulation, security, data integrity, concurrent access, and scalability while optimizing performance through indexing, query optimization, and caching. These database management system software are capable of dealing with staggering volumes of database in no time.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 15 hours ago
      @BOB They want it to be a disaster, that way they save endless amounts of money.  Then eventually when they get kicked out of power @ the next GE.  They will simply pile the blame onto others.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @BOB It probably won't affect the migration of ESA claimants to UC very much because you don't need another assessment at that point.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    As part of my role I support clients to complete PIP Review forms. I am finding that having completed and submitted a Review form in the majority of cases their existing award is then extended for a year without an assessment taking place. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 hours ago
      @Erica thanks for posting that, were waiting on our assessment and they said you get an extension a month out from end date, but still wasn't sure until I read your post that its still actually happening :)
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 hours ago
      @Gladioli Seems to be the case. We're capita, South Wales. Mine was called for review in April, with award ending December 2nd. Got a year's extension a fortnight ago. In our fb group it's more common than not. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Gladioli This has been the case for some time. However, most reassessments will occur well before that year is out. It's just a standard obligatory text message they send out. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    I am beginning it is the politicians fault for setting such ambitious targets on the DWP which they simply cannot meet as their targets keep changing causing more chaos as usual
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    I had to fill In a Esa review form back in January and haven't heard anything back from them
    When you phoned the dwp , there is a message saying we will contact you . There still sending them out.
    Migration to UC should be stopped until this and other things are sorted 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Telegraph copying a Times article which said "Young unemployed must take up training, education or face benefits cut".

    From where I sit Kendall wants the young up and on their feet. No mention of long term illness or disability. Her "getting Britain back to work" White paper is due to come out by the end of this month though where we'll see the true scale of her's, Milburn's and the DWP's plans.

    Then the conundrum of young people out of work due to Depression and Anxiety, what will Labour do? Will they join the Conservative minds in insulting them? Calling them in Isabel Oakeshott's words "Parasites"? Or will they help them? Give them all the help they need where integration into a workplace or educational environment is beneficial for them? 

    I'm actually concerned with the trivializing of Mental Illness in Britain from Conservative Minds. It cannot be stressed with Depressives that one day it's not getting up and staying in bed and then it goes to doing a Graham Thorpe.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    Still awaiting the decision to my review since April and the end date for my PIP is January 2025 so getting very close yet haven't heard a thing.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 hours ago
      @MJ they told me recently that you will get an extension automatically one month from your end date 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @MJ my pip has been extended to 2025 nov 
      now waiting 9 months for a review 

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact