Letter Appealing Decision

I'm about to send my letter appealing my ESA decision.

In the example letter (ESA Appeals), an example of where the assesment might be in error is included, as a suffer from ME/CFS I am struggling to come up with a "killer" example. Is not including an example a disadvantage at this point in the process?

One of the areas I am looking at is the issue of "reasonable regularity", could I use this as an example or is this best argued at the tribunal hearing?

Thanks - Steve

Classic case - you think you worded something so its completely clear and you haven't - mea culpa.

Just to clear up what I am asking for.

I am about to lodge an appeal against an initial finding that I am do not qualify for ESA payments.

There is a sample letter in the ESA appeals PDF in the members section, which includes a suggestion as to how to include an example of where information from the written response might have been ignored or mis-interpreted.

so my question is, is it important to include at least one example in the letter lodging an appeal or is OK to just say that I willl provide this information at a later date?

Steve

I opted not to include an example. I did not have one that was specific to a test, and I felt that if I argued "reasonable repeatability", whilst it might make the whole issue go away, I also might be re-assessed still without making the required 15 points, and it would be a lot more difficult to argue the difference than going from zero at the tribunal.

Thanks to everybody wo was able to comment, now I guess I wait

Steve