× Members

appeal

More
13 years 4 months ago #61751 by cdcdi1911
Replied by cdcdi1911 on topic Re:appeal
Gordon wrote:

bro58

I've found the document in question, the reference to appeals relates only to the Work Programme and not to WFIs.

Gordon

Hi Gordon

I think they amount to the same thing as the Work Programme is replacing Pathways to Work. I would presume the provider is the organization that provides the interviews as well as the activities like Pathways to Work.

However it does look like a proposed plan and I still haven't seen anything in the Regs, DWP guides or advice sources.

Regards

Derek

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • bro58
13 years 4 months ago - 13 years 4 months ago #61753 by bro58
Replied by bro58 on topic Re:appeal
Derek4 wrote:

Gordon wrote:

bro58

I've found the document in question, the reference to appeals relates only to the Work Programme and not to WFIs.

Gordon

Hi Gordon

I think they amount to the same thing as the Work Programme is replacing Pathways to Work. I would presume the provider is the organization that provides the interviews as well as the activities like Pathways to Work.

However it does look like a proposed plan and I still haven't seen anything in the Regs, DWP guides or advice sources.


Derek,

Have you accessed the doc from the link, on my second but last post.?

So do you or Gordon think I could quote Page 37 A2.22,to the DWP if needed, or indeed other members.?

I think it would be helpful if we could get some clarity, but understand if you can't commit, due to not seeing relevant regulations.

Cheers.
Last edit: 13 years 4 months ago by cdcdi1911. Reason: formatted quote

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
13 years 4 months ago #61755 by Gordon
Replied by Gordon on topic Re:appeal
bro58

I may be splitting hairs, but I thought the Work Programme represented the back end (no pun intended) of the WFI process.

So you would be referred to the Work Programme from a WFI, as I understood it, that was how the previous system worked.

However, the bottom line, as Derek says, is that this was a tender document for the Work Programme, and until we can find the policy in the actual ESA regulations, it doesn't count.

Gordon

Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • bro58
13 years 4 months ago #61756 by bro58
Replied by bro58 on topic Re:appeal
Gordon wrote:

bro58

I may be splitting hairs, but I thought the Work Programme represented the back end (no pun intended) of the WFI process.

So you would be referred to the Work Programme from a WFI, as I understood it, that was how the previous system worked.

However, the bottom line, as Derek says, is that this was a tender document for the Work Programme, and until we can find the policy in the actual ESA regulations, it doesn't count.

Gordon


O.K. I'll leave you in pieces on this matter. LOL!!

I still think I'll try waving it about in front of the DWP if necessary.

Hopefully might have proper legislation to refer to, if and when needed.

cheers

bro58

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
13 years 4 months ago #61757 by Gordon
Replied by Gordon on topic Re:appeal
bro58

If you find a legitimate reference, please let us know.

Gordon

Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
13 years 4 months ago #61759 by cdcdi1911
Replied by cdcdi1911 on topic Re:appeal
From the Rightsnet discussion below, which is a year old, it sounds like a regional policy being considered that varies from centre to centre.

www.rightsnet.org.uk/forums/viewreply/1776/

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: bro58GordonGaryBISCatherineWendyKellygreekqueenpeterKatherineSuper UserChrisDavid